Re: GPG4Win 2.2.3 Smart card support

2015-03-09 Thread NIIBE Yutaka
Hello, This is second time for me to receive the message like: > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in > error, please notify us immediately by

Re: Trezor - Could this be the model for a PGP crypto device?

2015-03-09 Thread NIIBE Yutaka
On 03/08/2015 12:09 AM, Felix E. Klee wrote: > It’s not about the UI being pretty. What I like about Trezor is that > it’s small yet has basically an external PIN pad, and every transaction > has to be confirmed by the push of a button. So, unless there are > backdoors (which also could be at chip

GPG4Win 2.2.3 Smart card support

2015-03-09 Thread Saxena, Deepak
Hello, I am Deepak Saxena from Gemalto (formerly SafeNet Inc) and I am curious if smart cards are supported for storing the keys which will be used to encrypt files or email using gpg4win. I have installed gpg4win 2.2.3 and want to test SafeNet smart cards. I am getting following error: [cid:i

Re: Suggestions for a Practical Scheme to Manage Multiple Identities?

2015-03-09 Thread NIIBE Yutaka
On 03/10/2015 08:06 AM, ime...@eml.cc wrote: > So this is not a question about portable flash drives vs. smartcards per > se. I _think_ I understand those risks and trade-offs but if there is > something I'm missing then, of course, I'd like to know. I had an experience that one of my family membe

Suggestions for a Practical Scheme to Manage Multiple Identities?

2015-03-09 Thread imeil8
Hi Folks- I have two identities with corresponding key pairs, one for work related needs and one for everything else. At the moment the keys for work live on my work machine and my everything else keys live on my laptop which I may or may not have access to at any given moment. The problem is some

Re: Anything that just works easily for folks?... without knowing this stuff.

2015-03-09 Thread Carolyn Anhalt
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Jean-David Beyer wrote: > On 03/09/2015 01:19 AM, Don Warner Saklad wrote: >> It's too complicated to setup, a too complicated learning curve to >> setup... How to make it easier needs to be a greater priority. >> > Albert Einstein is credited with saying: > > Every

Re: Anything that just works easily for folks?... without knowing this stuff.

2015-03-09 Thread Bob Holtzman
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 01:19:28AM -0400, Don Warner Saklad wrote: > It's too complicated to setup, a too complicated learning curve to > setup... How to make it easier needs to be a greater priority. Hand holding is down the hall on the left. -- Bob Holtzman Giant intergalactic brain-sucking hy

A strange problem with GnuPG & PSI/PSI+

2015-03-09 Thread Andy Brandt
I have a strange problem with GnuPG, that I have discovered when trying to get PSI to work with it. The scenario is pretty simple - I configure PSI for GnuPG encrypted messaging, then I do a test with another user. When I send a message to him all works ok, the message is encrypted and decrypts ok

Re: Thoughts on GnuPG and automation

2015-03-09 Thread Doug Barton
On 3/9/15 2:10 PM, Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh wrote: you will not get your desired results by starting the conversation impuning the work that went before and claiming that what you are asking for is far superior OTOH, it's often useful when talking about a possible direction for new projects to

Re: cython wrapping gpgme WAS: Thoughts on GnuPG and automation

2015-03-09 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 09/03/15 20:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> I have no idea about the Java tooling for interfacing to external >> libraries, but (after seeing so many complaints on the mailing list) >> I've recently started to work on Python bindings to GPGME using Cython, >> and so far it has been an extre

Re: Thoughts on GnuPG and automation

2015-03-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I expect a discussion about what is working and what is not working with GPGME and various GnuPG APIs. I'm just trying to convey my experience with GnuPG-for-Android, gnupg-for-java, and a little bit with Python. I hope this will spur people to offer their experience, and generate new ideas and

RE: Thoughts on GnuPG and automation

2015-03-09 Thread Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh
If that is the goal, that is a fair one. Thanks, Bob Cavanaugh > -Original Message- > From: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:h...@guardianproject.info] > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 2:22 PM > To: Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh; Peter Lebbing > Cc: gnupg > Subject: Re: Thoughts on GnuPG and auto

RE: Thoughts on GnuPG and automation

2015-03-09 Thread Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh
Hi Hans, Wanted to respond to your post wondering why you are getting the responses you are. In another thread you write: "There are other C-Python wrappers of GPGME, like pyme. I hope you're aware of those, and have studied them. One thing that GnuPG suffers from is many people starting the

Re: Thoughts on GnuPG and automation

2015-03-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Why do I get so many responses like this on this list? I've spent a ton of time solving our own problems with the Android port, we also made sure to take out a support contract with Werner to pay him to answer our questions. I only wish we'd had more so we could pay him for all the work he has d

cython wrapping gpgme WAS: Thoughts on GnuPG and automation

2015-03-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Daniele Nicolodi: > On 03/03/15 14:29, Hans of Guardian wrote: >> It is actually more difficult to wrap GPGME in Java than to have just >> rewritten GPGME in Java. GPGME is a fine API for C/C++, it is a bad >> API for other languages. You end up with an API that feels like a C >> API forced into

Re: Thoughts on GnuPG and automation

2015-03-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Werner Koch: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 21:29, h...@guardianproject.info said: > >> * Android will kill apps when it needs to, app lifecycle is automatically >> managed, >> the app has no control over it, and often zero warning is given > > That is the same as with Linux. Ever heard of the OOM kil

Re: gpgme and Java

2015-03-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Werner Koch: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 00:57, h...@guardianproject.info said: > >> thread at this point. The bizarre Java wrapper of GPGME was not the >> biggest part of the problem of the GnuPG-for-Android port, but it was >> nonetheless a real problem. Sure it is possible to use GPGME with > > Y

AES-NI, symmetric key generation

2015-03-09 Thread Maricel Gregoraschko
Hello All,I would first like to thank you for your effort and time developing gnupgp.I have a couple of questions: 1. Does GnuGP (in particular, the Windows binaries distributed for gpg4win) use AES-NI, the Intel dedicated AES instruction set? There are some concerns, I'm not sure how realistic,

Re: Anything that just works easily for folks?... without knowing this stuff.

2015-03-09 Thread Jean-David Beyer
On 03/09/2015 01:19 AM, Don Warner Saklad wrote: > It's too complicated to setup, a too complicated learning curve to > setup... How to make it easier needs to be a greater priority. > Albert Einstein is credited with saying: Everything should be made as simple as possible: BUT NO SIMPLER. --

Re: Heise: De-Mail integrates End-2-End Encryption with PGP

2015-03-09 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:37, m.mansf...@mansfeld-elektronik.de said: > Anybody here from the GnuPG developers involved in that stuff? Not that I know. Keep in mind that De-mail system has a serious problem: As soon as you register an account you are legally forced to check that account timely. All

Heise: De-Mail integrates End-2-End Encryption with PGP

2015-03-09 Thread Matthias Mansfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 At heise.de: De-Mail integrates End-2-End Encryption with PGP Currently only in German language, but I assume everybody here who is involved especially in semi-official German mail infrastructures like De-Mail can read and understand this stuff.. O