On Thu 2015-01-15 05:42:20 -0500, georgeorwellhardwi...@riseup.net wrote:
> Every time I use GPA in ubuntu it says, when I start GPA: "GnuPG is
> rebuilding the trust database.
> This might take a few seconds." And I can wait for hours, while nothing
> happens.
I'm not seeing this with debian u
On 01/14/2015 10:53 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 1/14/15 7:09 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>> "gpg: O g: can't encode a 256 bit key in a 0 bit frame"
>>
>> This happens after I tell the program to accept the final key in the
>> group as valid. But it doesn't seem to be related to a key since
On 15.01.15 09:56, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:59, jose.casti...@gmail.com said:
>
>> Now that we cannot specify a passphrase in the batch parameters, what
>> is the preferred method for batch key generation with a specified
>> passphrase?
>
> Thanks for this question. The Enigma
Hi,
I recently installed GnuPG 2.1 and successfully used gpgsm for about a
week. This morning, signing messages with mutt failed, and the signature
of received messages cannot be verified. Signing a test file reveals:
lbox:~ jan$ gpgsm --verbose --sign testfile.txt
gpgsm: certificate is not usabl
Hi,
the problem might be related to issue 1644
(http://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1644), my cert is part of the
DFN-PKI.
- Jan
On 2015-01-15 10:23, Jan Eden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently installed GnuPG 2.1 and successfully used gpgsm for about a
> week. This morning, signing messages with mutt
Hey.
Every time I use GPA in ubuntu it says, when I start GPA: "GnuPG is
rebuilding the trust database.
This might take a few seconds." And I can wait for hours, while nothing
happens.
And If I try to close the window and try to generate a GPG key, it will
say: "The GPGME library returned a
Subject: cannot build database in GPA in ubuntu and won't generate GPG
key.
Hey.
Every time I use GPA in ubuntu it says, when I start GPA: "GnuPG is
rebuilding the trust database.
This might take a few seconds." And I can wait for hours, while nothing
happens.
And If I try to close the wind
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:59, jose.casti...@gmail.com said:
> Now that we cannot specify a passphrase in the batch parameters, what
> is the preferred method for batch key generation with a specified
> passphrase?
Thanks for this question. The Enigmail folks also asked on how to do
this and my answ