-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 30 November 2014 at 9:46:40 AM, in
, gnupgp...@on.yourweb.de wrote:
> Yes, that's true, SMTP-Filter is running for outgoing
> mails:
> http://lab1.de/Central/Software/Internet/E-Mail/SMTP-Filter/
> It deletes for security/privacy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 30 November 2014 at 7:21:09 PM, in
, gnupgp...@on.yourweb.de wrote:
> So, is there a known issue regarding the order of
> DSA-subkeys for signing? How to change order of subkeys
> for testing purpose?
- From (possibly inaccurate)
On Sunday 30 November 2014 10:46:40 gnupgp...@on.yourweb.de wrote:
> >> I am sorry, all my replies are sent to gnupg-users@gnupg.org only,
> >
> > Yes, that's the right procedure.
> > The problem Peter mentioned is caused by the fact that your replies lack
> > the message headers (In-reply-to and
> Which one is better/more used?
WinPT only works with the 1.4 branch of GnuPG and hasn't had a new
release in the last five years. I'm under the impression Timo (the
author) has stopped working on it or supporting it. Given that, I'd
have to recommend not using WinPT.
_
> while creating some new v4-RSA keypairs a compatibility issue occurs with
> old PGP-6.5.x:
6.5.8 is about sixteen years old now and has many known security
problems. Please stop using it.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://list
Hello to all,
while creating some new v4-RSA keypairs a compatibility issue occurs with
old PGP-6.5.x:
C,E should be RSA, S should be DSA (2048 with SHA256 for smaller
signatures...)
Sec/pub keyset is used with GPG-1.4.18 (Win7-64), pub key is exported to
PGP-6.5.x only for testing purpose on an
On 30/11/14 01:32, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> The keygrip is protocol-agnostic whereby the fingerprint would differ
> e.g. between OpenPGP and X.509. From [0] (note "[2]"):
>
> The keygrip is a unique identifier for a key pair, it is
> independent of any protocol, so that the same key can be u
>> I am sorry, all my replies are sent to gnupg-users@gnupg.org only,
> Yes, that's the right procedure.
> The problem Peter mentioned is caused by the fact that your replies lack
> the message headers (In-reply-to and References) that usually link
> replies to the replied-to messages.
Yes, that
