-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 21 July 2014 at 8:56:21 PM, in
, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> I don't think this helps much authenticating one SMTP
> server to another. Even if it would be possible, they
> are usually operated by ISP's; I don't see them using
> the WoT f
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 06:18:39PM +0200, The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm
wrote:
> I wonder if Mutt can be configured to decrypt inline pgp messages
> automatically, without piping the attachment to `gpg --decrypt`. I
> know, piping works, but it'd be more convenient to have mutt do the
> piping
On 07/21/2014 09:23 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
By the way, regarding DANE as an alternative to the CA system: I think a proper
implementation of authentication through DNS could well be way better than the
CA system: at least you can only be screwed by people having access to signing
keys for the r
On 21/07/14 21:15, MFPA wrote:
> Doesn't Monkeysphere [0] allow the use of the OpenPGP web of trust to
> authenticate certificates for TLS?
I don't think this helps much authenticating one SMTP server to another. Even if
it would be possible, they are usually operated by ISP's; I don't see them us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 21 July 2014 at 5:23:51 PM, in
, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 21/07/14 15:32, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>> Please remind me why we need an alternative to TLS.
> Well, I actually meant X.509 and the CA system, which
> is what is currently abu
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:12:36AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 05:46:02PM -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 01:55:45PM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > > > A factor of two is "immense" to you...?
> > >
> > > Yes. A secret that only I know I can keep
On 21/07/14 15:32, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> Please remind me why we need an alternative to TLS.
Well, I actually meant X.509 and the CA system, which is what is currently
abundantly used in SSL and TLS. If you plug in a different form of
authentication, I think the rest is okay.
> I treat hop-by-hop
On 07/21/2014 04:33 AM, war.dhan wrote:
> i have created a key pair using the defaults at first.
> et the owners trust as ultimate using enigmail 1.7.
> then i realised about not adding :
> personal-digest-preferences SHA256
> cert-digest-algo SHA256
> default-preference-list SHA512 SHA384 SHA256 S
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:52, ret...@rethab.ch said:
> I read in the ruby-bindings library that this only worked with version 1.X
> but seems not to work anymore with 2.X. Is there any truth to this?
Right. GnuPG-2 require the gpg-agent and the gpg-agent is soley
responsible for asking for the pass
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 18:18, whirlp...@blinkenshell.org said:
> I wonder if Mutt can be configured to decrypt inline pgp messages
> automatically, without piping the attachment to `gpg --decrypt`.
IIRC, I implemented that about a decade ago. Simply put
set crypt_use_gpgme
into your ~/.muttrc.
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:56, bernh...@intevation.de said:
> Do you also know the status of CMS (x.509) for S/MIME?
May work but likely needs a bit of testing and code fiddling. I have
lost most interest in CMS, thus better do not expect that I will spend
time on it.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
-
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 02:26:44PM +0200, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> By the way: if we had a working alternative to SSL/TLS, all the mail
> servers could talk to eachother securely without eavesdropping. That way
Please remind me why we need an alternative to TLS.
> the contents of e-mails is only ex
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:33, wardhan.v@gmail.com said:
> to my surprise the 2nd key pair has owners trust as ultimate.
Ultimate trust is always set for newly created keys. It is not set if
you import a key.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesges
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:44, andreas.schwier...@cardcontact.de said:
> we've added support for the SmartCard-HSM to scdaemon. Please find the
> patch that applies to master at [1].
If you want me to apply that patch please read doc/DETAILS on how to
send a DCO. (I'd appreciate a sample
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 05:46:02PM -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 01:55:45PM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > > A factor of two is "immense" to you...?
> >
> > Yes. A secret that only I know I can keep; a secret known to two people
> > can only be kept for a while. Yes, t
i have created a key pair using the defaults at first.
et the owners trust as ultimate using enigmail 1.7.
then i realised about not adding :
personal-digest-preferences SHA256
cert-digest-algo SHA256
default-preference-list SHA512 SHA384 SHA256 SHA224 AES256 AES192 AES
CAST5 ZLIB BZIP2 ZIP Uncompr
16 matches
Mail list logo
