Matt D wrote on 12/19/13, 3:25 PM:
> I am running enigmail 1.5.2 . Is this old? How can I get the
> latest? Thanks!
According to the raw source of your message, you are running:
"User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/24.2.0"
and
"X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
On Dec 19, 2013, at 7:10 PM, Eric Swanson wrote:
> I'm trying to import a "raw" RSA secret key into GnuPG.
>
> I have p, q, d and the creation timestamp, as well as anything else
> that can be computed from them (n, u, e, etc etc).
>
> I've been implementing bits of RFC 4880 in an attempt to ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello all,
I'm trying to import a "raw" RSA secret key into GnuPG.
I have p, q, d and the creation timestamp, as well as anything else
that can be computed from them (n, u, e, etc etc).
I've been implementing bits of RFC 4880 in an attempt to gene
I just donated € 75 to the crowdfunding campaign (and will soon be wearing a
nice t-shirt). Will you also match that or are you restricting
yourself to the "normal" Christmassy donations?
On January 6 (the Feast of the Epiphany, the traditional end of the
Christmas season) I'll ask Werner
Seems likely. (Nice that some NSA activity has just been declared
un-constitutional (glimpsed on TV)).
A district court judge found the program unconstitutional, but his
decision is *extremely* controversial right now. I would happily bet
cash money on even odds that this decision will be
On 07/12/13 05:16, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> To show this, I'm going to be making a contribution to GnuPG. And to
> encourage you to make your own contribution, I will match any
> contribution you make between now and January 1, 2014.
I just donated € 75 to the crowdfunding campaign (and will soo
From: Johannes
> > it comes from the tradition of spanking a
> > newborn child in order to spur the child into taking its first breath.
>
> ...and I have learned something new today ;-)
I didnt know the original derivation either :-)
From: Werner
> I bet we will eventually hear about the NSA
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:54, o...@mat.ucm.es said:
> Since you are mentioned in this webpage, do you know by any chance
> whether gpgsm is vulnerable in a similar way?
gpgsm uses Libgcrypt and Libgcrypt employs RSA blinding for a long time
now. Thus it is not vulnerable. The reason Libgcrypt has
On Thursday 19 December 2013 10:09:22 Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Maybe my English is a little rusty, but what exactly is a "spanking
> > server"?
> They omitted the word "new".
Ah! I should have thought of this. The phrase as a whole is known to me, but
without the "new" it was only nonsense to
On 19/12/13 16:44, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe my English is a little rusty, but what exactly is a "spanking server"?
There could be a word missing here. There is the phrase 'spanking new'
which means really, really new!
Or as it is, it could just mean a nice powerful does everything s
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:35, j...@berklix.com said:
> You might want to suggest to goteo.org it might be quicker for them to use
> a translater engine then hand correct, rather than translate & type all ?
A reason might be that they have concerns publishing a translation if
not done by lawyer. How
I think "brand spanking
new server" might also leave nationals of some other international
english variant speaking countries (eg USA) & non native speakers
puzzled.
It's in common usage in the U.S., although I more often hear it
without the "brand" prefix. That said, "brand spanking new" is
Maybe my English is a little rusty, but what exactly is a "spanking server"?
They omitted the word "new". "Spanking new" is an English idiom for
something that's brand-new; it comes from the tradition of spanking a
newborn child in order to spur the child into taking its first breath.
So
Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe my English is a little rusty, but what exactly is a "spanking server"?
Presumably a contraction from "brand spanking new" a phrase normal
& common in England when I grew up there. I think "brand spanking
new server" might also leave nationals of some other int
>> "Werner" == Werner Koch writes:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:31, sys...@ioioioio.eu said:
>> "Here, we describe a new acoustic cryptanalysis key extraction attack,
>> applicable to GnuPG's current implementation of RSA. The attack can
> Well that is what I posted a few hours ago to th
Hi,
Maybe my English is a little rusty, but what exactly is a "spanking server"?
>From the goteo page:
> The world's most trusted data encryption tool gets a new website with
> spanking server, platform and design.
Johannes
___
Gnupg-users mailing
Hi Werner & all
Re http://goteo.org
> The privacy policy and the terms or services are not translated to
> English - this is an unfortunate oversight of us.
http://gnupg.org/
http://goteo.org/project/gnupg-new-website-and-infrastructure
http://goteo.org/legal/terms
Seems to be in mid ed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Werner,
am 19.12.2013 11:08, schrieb Werner Koch:
> Today GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) has launched its first crowdfunding
> campaign [1] with the aim of building a new website and long term
> infrastructure. The 24.000 EUR target ...
congratu
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:31, go...@fsfe.org said:
> point. Choosing goteo was IMHO a good idea because their system is Free
> Software and I don't know if they even support BTC et al.
Indeed. After all crowd funding is about community building and thus I
consider it the Right Thing to help each ot
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:45, ricu...@gmail.com said:
> As this is about a crypto project, wouldn't it be adequate to accept
> payments in crypto currencies?
Agreed. However, we don't have the resources to do that. The new
infrastructure topic covers payment options and likely we will accept
Bitcoi
On 12/19/2013 8:25 AM, Matt D wrote:
> I am running enigmail 1.5.2 . Is this old? How can I get the
> latest? Thanks!
The latest Enigmail is 1.6. 1.5.2 is not tremendously old, but it's not
the latest-and-greatest, either.
Given that you got GnuPG and Enigmail from GPGtools, your best bet is
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:17, christophe.bro...@cnamts.fr said:
> It is not very clear on the website campaign that the completion of the GnuPG
> 2.1 is in the scope of the campaign.
GnuPG 2.1 will be ready with the new website or even earlier. However,
2.1 won't immediately replace 2.0 (or 1.4) on
* Richard Ulrich [131219 13:47,
mID <1387457142.1836.18.camel@XPS13dev>]:
> As this is about a crypto project, wouldn't it be adequate to accept
> payments in crypto currencies?
I wouldn't consider this a priority. Bitcoin violates one of the
fundamental laws of economics and is therefore sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am running enigmail 1.5.2 . Is this old? How can I get the
latest? Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: MacGPG2 - http://www.gpgtools.org/macgpg2.html
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www
As this is about a crypto project, wouldn't it be adequate to accept
payments in crypto currencies?
Rgds
Richard
On Don, 2013-12-19 at 11:08 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> GnuPG encryption project launches crowdfunding campaign
>
> Today GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) has launched its first crowdfunding
Le 19/12/2013 11:08, Werner Koch a écrit :
> GnuPG encryption project launches crowdfunding campaign
>
> Today GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) has launched its first crowdfunding
> campaign [1] with the aim of building a new website and long term
> infrastructure. The 24.000 EUR target will fund:
>
> -
GnuPG encryption project launches crowdfunding campaign
Today GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) has launched its first crowdfunding
campaign [1] with the aim of building a new website and long term
infrastructure. The 24.000 EUR target will fund:
- Fresh web interfaces for gnupg.org including mobile
27 matches
Mail list logo
