On 10/24/2013 04:46 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg?
>
> Mostly zealotry. According to NIST, RSA-2048 is expected to be secure
> for about the next 25 years.
To add further to this, the U.S. military uses 2048 bit RSA keys for
Johan Wevers wrote:
>On 25-10-2013 1:46, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
>> Mostly zealotry. According to NIST, RSA-2048 is expected to be
>secure
>> for about the next 25 years.
>
>The authority of NIST is of course severely reduced since the Snowden
>revelations and their own suspicious behaviour wit
On 25-10-2013 1:46, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Mostly zealotry. According to NIST, RSA-2048 is expected to be secure
> for about the next 25 years.
The authority of NIST is of course severely reduced since the Snowden
revelations and their own suspicious behaviour with the Dual EC PRNG.
Further,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 21:05 +0200, Sylvain wrote:
>> Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg?
> As they write,... they don't see a specific (i.e. technical or
> performance) reason not to do so.
>
> So
Hi David,
Thank you for your prompt response. The files which are sent by JP Morgan are
using ascii mode of transfer and the files are ascii armored as well.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Thanks,
Vineeta
-Original Message-
From: David Shaw [mailto:ds...@jabberwocky.com]
Hello,
Thanks for reply. I have did all that you wrote in the previous mail. I have
dropped the pinentry.mk that you attached in the email to the mxe/src folder,
but it won't work.
But, just some moments ago i have successfully built the whole Gpg4Win :), by
following the instructions from the
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 21:05 +0200, Sylvain wrote:
> Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg?
As they write,... they don't see a specific (i.e. technical or
performance) reason not to do so.
Some people may argue that 2048 is secure enough for many many years to
come.
On 13-10-22 04:57 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
> It appears you probably meant the communication with
> "bob@corporate.domain" was the out-of-band channel by which you and
> Bob told each other your OpenPGP key fingerprints, and that being able
> to send emails from those corporate accounts also doub
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:49, nikola.radovano...@seavus.com said:
> 1) When trying to build whole Gpg4Win i ran into several
> problems. Package for gtkhtmlviewer2 couldn't be found, but i have
Unfortunately this kind of problems happen from time to time. You may
delete the claws-mail tar package f
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:53, nikola.radovano...@seavus.com said:
> Right now, by building the whole gpg4win i have succeeded in what i wanted,
> but i will certainly try again with MXE to see what is the problem there.
I am glad to hear that. I will add some more tests to the installer.
Just for
On 25.10.2013, Sylvain wrote:
> Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg?
It's a matter of taste, and there are arguments both for and against.
In my case, having a 4096 bit key has no major drawbacks, so I'm using
one. If you trust gpg, you can safely trust the stan
Hi,
On Thursday 24 October 2013 20:49:09 Nikola Radovanovic wrote:
> 1) When trying to build whole Gpg4Win i ran into several problems. Package
> for gtkhtmlviewer2 couldn't be found, but i have resolved it. This archive
> is now moved to plugins_obsolete folder (instead plugins) on a target url.
12 matches
Mail list logo
