Am Mo 14.10.2013, 06:41:25 schrieb NdK:
> What I still couldn't understand is how I can sign a key saying "I'm
> really sure of the owner's identity, but I don't really trust him
> properly handling other signatures"
That is a strange question because normal certifications do not include any
sta
Il 11/10/2013 07:24, Hauke Laging ha scritto:
> My OpenPGP specific aim is that such a standardized list would be implemented
> in OpenPGP applications, probably as a signature notation. The typical user
> would have several keys (for the same address) at different security levels.
> Thus the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 12 October 2013 at 12:10:16 AM, in
, Hauke Laging wrote:
> What makes the one statement better than the other? You
> usually cannot prove that a certain person has shown
> you a certain passport-like document. And without a
> manu
On 10/11/2013 10:40 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> Nothing nefarious going on, nor is it a bug. Take a look at the source of your
> PGP/MIME signed email.
>
>> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
>> --===0134039850==
>> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512
