Re: [#INN-651-31269]: Re: key management & APG

2013-08-04 Thread Henry Hertz Hobbit
On 08/04/2013 09:55 PM, MFPA wrote: > Hi > > > On Sunday 4 August 2013 at 9:24:51 PM, in > , Larry Brower wrote: > > >> What is with the helpdesk being a list member? > > I suspect somebody has forwarded their mail to the helpdesk, > forgetting to turn off message delivery from the list and th

Re: [#INN-651-31269]: Re: key management & APG

2013-08-04 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Sunday 4 August 2013 at 9:24:51 PM, in , Larry Brower wrote: > What is with the helpdesk being a list member? I suspect somebody has forwarded their mail to the helpdesk, forgetting to turn off message delivery from the list and thereby ca

Re: [#INN-651-31269]: Re: key management & APG

2013-08-04 Thread Larry Brower
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/04/2013 10:27 AM, TeamSpeak Piracy wrote: > Hauke Laging, > > Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming > the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as > soon as possible. For your records, t

[#KOD-468-37737]: Re: best practice for handing over the private key

2013-08-04 Thread TeamSpeak Piracy
Simon Ward, Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as soon as possible. For your records, the details of the ticket are listed below. When replying, please make sure that the ticket ID is kept in the

[#INN-651-31269]: Re: key management & APG

2013-08-04 Thread TeamSpeak Piracy
Hauke Laging, Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as soon as possible. For your records, the details of the ticket are listed below. When replying, please make sure that the ticket ID is kept in th

Re: key management & APG

2013-08-04 Thread Hauke Laging
Am So 04.08.2013, 10:00:49 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause: > > Then the sender can decide how confidential the information is (or how > > reliable the signature must be). > > You mean creating two separate keys for the same email address? And sign > each with the other? You may sign them with each

Re: best practice for handing over the private key

2013-08-04 Thread Simon Ward
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 04:31:24PM +0300, Martin T wrote: > > Your description sounds, to me, as if you are only generating a key for the > > other persons use. > > Not quite. At the beginning I need to use those keys myself in order > to create the needed database objects. Once those are done, I

[#FNF-875-55415]: Re: key management & APG

2013-08-04 Thread TeamSpeak Piracy
Philipp Klaus Krause, Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as soon as possible. For your records, the details of the ticket are listed below. When replying, please make sure that the ticket ID is ke

Re: key management & APG

2013-08-04 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
Am 03.08.2013 14:51, schrieb Hauke Laging: > Am Sa 03.08.2013, 12:16:56 schrieb ix4...@gmail.com: > >> On 30 July 2013 22:30, wrote: > >>> I only need one GPG identity for now. I also use GPG on devices of two >>> classes: "Secure" and "insecure". I would like to take some operational >>> securi