On 07/16/2013 04:04 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:08, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com said:
>
>> This will create a single "output file name" with the entire "filelist" each
>> individually encrypted.
>
> That is the PGP Zip format, right? We support it for ages; our tool is
> calle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/16/2013 03:24 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Ira--
>
> On 07/16/2013 11:08 AM, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com wrote:
>> With PGP you can do something like: pgp -e -r
>> -o --archive
>>
>> This will create a single "output file name" with t
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:08, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com said:
> This will create a single "output file name" with the entire "filelist" each
> individually encrypted.
That is the PGP Zip format, right? We support it for ages; our tool is
called gpg-zip and creates a compatible archive. Technicall
On 2013-07-16 15:32, Werner Koch wrote:
You have a version B of your key, with a different password than
version A (where the primary key is still present)? Not that one
particular subkey per se has a different password?
Usually this does not happen because GnuPG < 2.1 has no feature to merge
On 07/16/2013 10:49 AM, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com wrote:
> We are converting from using PGP to using GnuPG and we are trying to make it
> seamless to our customers. Using PGP, when we had multiple files to deliver,
> we could have each file encrypted and placed into a PGP archive. The client
>
Hi Ira--
On 07/16/2013 11:08 AM, ira.kirsch...@sungard.com wrote:
> With PGP you can do something like:
> pgp -e -r -o --archive
>
> This will create a single "output file name" with the entire "filelist" each
> individually encrypted.
I don't have PGP, so i still don't know what the r
With PGP you can do something like:
pgp -e -r -o --archive
This will create a single "output file name" with the entire "filelist" each
individually encrypted.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor [mailto:d...@fifthhorseman.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:58 AM
T
We are converting from using PGP to using GnuPG and we are trying to make it
seamless to our customers. Using PGP, when we had multiple files to deliver,
we could have each file encrypted and placed into a PGP archive. The client
could then decipher the archive to extract al the encrypted files
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:21, biggles.tren...@gmail.com said:
> A GnuPG key has a private key and a public key. When you first create
All public key algorithms work with the concept of a keypair. GnuPG
does the same. This is the low level maths. To make it usable we need
to bind mail addresses to
reflum,
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 07:16 +0800, Martin wrote:
> * I find them Confusing.
So what's the point here? If he doesn't yet the concept it doesn't mean
it is bad. It's just a statement about him, not the standard. e.g. I
haven't got the concept of armoured concrete, yet I life in a house
buil
On 2013-07-16 10:52, gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org wrote:
Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:09:38 +0200
> From: Werner Koch
> To: Martin
> Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: Several master keys vs. master key and subkeys
> Message-ID: <87k3krj58d@vigenere.g10code.de>
Content-T
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:09, w...@gnupg.org said:
> remove the debug output and use this updated fix. Something might have
> gone wrong during the build process - we need to check.
We figured out what has gone wrong: The problem affects only the 64
bit version of gpgex. The gpg4win installer use
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:28, jo...@netpage.dk said:
> Yes I am sure. I even uninstalled it completely right now, rebooted
> and then reinstalled!
Thanks. Well, there is a problem we need to figure out.
Using my Windows versions (no Windows8 here right now), I can't
replicate the problem. Thus I b
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 07:03:54AM +0800, Martin wrote:
>
> Now I have to walk down yet another rabbit hole and read up about secure
> cards :)
You don't really have to, though I prefer the added security and, at least
after you've set it up to work properly, the added conveninece of the Crypto
S
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:16, martin.brochh...@gmail.com said:
> This person claims that subkeys are not the best option because:
>
> ### QUOTE ###
>
> Disadvantages of subkeys:
>
> * I find them Confusing.
They mandotory part of the standard and solve the problem of having
separate keys for separat
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:51, jo...@netpage.dk said:
> I have the same problem on my german 64bit Windows 8 with Version 2.2.0-beta31
Are you shure that you are using the new version; i.e. did you reboot
your machine?
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bunde
16 matches
Mail list logo
