On 27/06/13 12:49 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:00, di4...@nottheoilrig.com said:
Thanks Werner, I want to keep my primary key on a separate keyring
(does this require putting subkeys under a different primary key?)
No. We use a stub key instead. The command is
gpg --exp
On 06/27/2013 09:24 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> Some of the discussion in this bug seems relevant to the GnuPG and
> GnuPG2 packages in Debian, but the bug is against the archive
> pseudo-package:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612657
I wouldn't classify it as a bug but I did
Some of the discussion in this bug seems relevant to the GnuPG and
GnuPG2 packages in Debian, but the bug is against the archive
pseudo-package:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612657
Can anybody else make any comments:
a) should there be more effort to phase out SHA1?
b) how i
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:00, di4...@nottheoilrig.com said:
> Thanks Werner, I want to keep my primary key on a separate keyring
> (does this require putting subkeys under a different primary key?)
No. We use a stub key instead. The command is
gpg --export-secret-subkeys KEYID >newkey.gpg
Run