On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Mustrum wrote:
> I already moved my subkeys to one cryptostick.
> When i tried to move the primary key (4096 RSA) to another stick i got:
>
>>gpg> keytocard
>>Really move the primary key? (y/N) y
>>Signature key : [none]
>>Encryption key: [none]
>>Authentic
I already moved my subkeys to one cryptostick.
When i tried to move the primary key (4096 RSA) to another stick i got:
>gpg> keytocard
>Really move the primary key? (y/N) y
>Signature key : [none]
>Encryption key: [none]
>Authentication key: [none]
>Please select where to store the key:
>
On 06/03/2013 08:04 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> Bitcoin is essentially a ledger where you have an array of fingerprints
> (160 bit hashes of a public key) and a value (number of coins in wallet).
i thought that bitcoin didn't hash the public keys at all, but rather
used the full elliptic curve p
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Branko Majic wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm looking into setting myself up with some OpenPGP cards, and I'm
> looking into some opinions on using separate OpenPGP card for the
> master key and sub-keys vs using a single OpenPGP card.
>
> The idea behind this would be t
Hello all,
I'm looking into setting myself up with some OpenPGP cards, and I'm
looking into some opinions on using separate OpenPGP card for the
master key and sub-keys vs using a single OpenPGP card.
The idea behind this would be that my master OpenPGP card would be kept
in a safe area (hidden c
On 1 April 2013 19:46, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 12:24 PM, adrelanos wrote:
>
> > gpg uses only(?) 40 chars for the fingerprint.
> > (I mean the output of: gpg --fingerprint --keyid-format long.)
>
> this is a 160-bit SHA-1 digest of the public key material and the
> creation dat
