Re: gpg for pseudonymous users [was: Re: gpg for anonymous users - Alternative to the web of trust?]

2013-04-06 Thread Jean-David Beyer
On 04/06/2013 01:10 PM, Ryan Sawhill wrote: > I wouldn't have to work at Red Hat to find your imagining of all this > hilarious. No offense meant. I am not offended; just ignorant of some of the details of this. > > What makes the most sense: that all packages are built on a handful of > central

Re: gpg for pseudonymous users [was: Re: gpg for anonymous users - Alternative to the web of trust?]

2013-04-06 Thread Ryan Sawhill
I wouldn't have to work at Red Hat to find your imagining of all this hilarious. No offense meant. What makes the most sense: that all packages are built on a handful of central build servers (individual maintainers building packages? seriously?) on a private network and that as part of that autom