On 02/21/2013 07:50 AM, John A. Wallace wrote:
> Can I get a link discussing one or more of a typical situations when options
> files are used? Thanks
Some of us are collecting "best practice" suggestions over here:
https://we.riseup.net/riseuplabs+paow/openpgp-best-practices#update-your-gpg-defa
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, Mark Campo wrote:
Assume I had the GnuPG/PGP software.yet tell me how you would use GnuPG/PGP
to encrypt the file and what instructions or methods you would need me to
use to get the encrypted file and decrypt it on the recipients machine
WITHOUT the recipient having Gnu
On 02/24/2013 03:27 PM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> Ship a device.
Meaning what, exactly? At first blush you seem to be trading one
problem for another: people don't know how to use GnuPG, so ship a
device and now they don't know how to use the device.
> Your argument seems to show that, in order to
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 02/24/2013 08:21 AM, Anonymous wrote:
You seem to imply that Americans are less capable or less interested
in PGP-protected mail.
Oh, please. This is pure projection.
The German bank "1822 Direkt" sends PGP encrypted bank statements to
th
On 02/24/2013 08:21 AM, Anonymous wrote:
> You seem to imply that Americans are less capable or less interested
> in PGP-protected mail.
Oh, please. This is pure projection.
> The German bank "1822 Direkt" sends PGP encrypted bank statements to
> their customers. Someone mentioned another Germa
Assume I had the GnuPG/PGP software.yet tell me how you would use GnuPG/PGP
to encrypt the file and what instructions or methods you would need me to
use to get the encrypted file and decrypt it on the recipients machine
WITHOUT the recipient having GnuPG/PGP software loaded to the recipient
system
>OpenPGP, no, because there's no business case for them to do so.
>OpenPGP users represent a phenomenally small fraction of their userbase
>(probably <1%) and would account for a large fraction of their tech
>support questions.
You seem to imply that Americans are less capable or less interested
i