Would it make sense to amend that to add SHA-3?
--Avi
On 1/30/13, Michel Messerschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 06:36:25PM -0600, John Clizbe wrote:
>> ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
>> > if so, would this fall under the open-pgp RFC, or would it have to go
>> > through an
>> > RSA standard
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 at 3:28 PM, "Michel Messerschmidt"
wrote:
>
>Although it is the default, RFC 3447 is not restricted to SHA-1.
>Appendix B actually states:
>"For the RSAES-OAEP encryption scheme and EMSA-PSS encoding
>method,
>only SHA-1 and SHA-256/384/512 are recommended."
Wh
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 06:36:25PM -0600, John Clizbe wrote:
> ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> > if so, would this fall under the open-pgp RFC, or would it have to go
> > through an
> > RSA standard first?
>
> RFC 4880 makes no mention of OAEP. RFC 4880 references RFC 3447 for details of
> RSA imple
