Nice angle Stan.
Peter M , you sir are on point.
Faramir, my personal perspective is that good software should be
like.. gnu/linux. Simply enough for simpletons/ average joes/janes to
use,but adaptable enough to grow and adapt to meet the needs and skill
of the user.
Robert Hansen - (You sha
On 8/26/12 5:37 PM, Stan Tobias wrote:
> In the works cited before (this thread and other discussions),
> one recurring concern could be formulated as: "Why Johnny doesn't
> encrypt his Christmas greetings to his granny?", with an implicit
> assumption/expectation that everybody ought to use crypto
I'm sorry, if this is not quite topical, but the questions raised on
this list why cryptography is not taken up by Johnny Public return
here often, and I would like to share my mind and expand on my previous
thoughts.
In the works cited before (this thread and other discussions),
one recurring con
On 25/08/12 17:41, Charly Avital - shavi...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody has to hide, this is not about hiding. [...] when one
> sends or receives an encrypted message, the mere
format of such a communication hollers loud and clear that
the user is protecting his/her communications, not hiding.
T
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:35, faramir...@gmail.com said:
> Sure, as long no moderator gets pissed off, I think it is good to
There are no moderators on this list. Moderation is only needed for
postings from non-subscribers. And while I mention this: A big thank to
those folks who take care of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 25-08-2012 10:33, Stan Tobias escribió:
> As this thread is turning into a general discussion on privacy and
> encryption, I would like just to add one more to the garden of
> thoughts.
Sure, as long no moderator gets pissed off, I think it is
