-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 25-08-2012 1:35, Laurent Jumet escribió:
> Hello Faramir !
Hello Lauren,
> On your message below, my GPG gives this warning:
>
> === Begin Windows Clipboard === gpg: armor: BEGIN PGP SIGNED
> MESSAGE gpg: armor header: Hash: SHA256 :packet
Hello Faramir !
On your message below, my GPG gives this warning:
=== Begin Windows Clipboard ===
gpg: armor: BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
gpg: armor header: Hash: SHA256
:packet 63: length 11 - gpg control packet
gpg: armor: BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 24-08-2012 19:33, Robert J. Hansen escribió:
...
> Thank you, John. Simson Garfinkel has another one worth adding to
> the list, but I'm blanking on it for the life of me right now --
> give me a
Maybe "Bridge over troubled waters"? (I'm joki
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 07:33 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Thank you, John. Simson Garfinkel has another one worth adding to the
>> list, but I'm blanking on it for the life of me right now -- give me a
>> day or two to dig through my pile of papers and I'll come up with it.
>
C
On 08/24/2012 07:33 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Thank you, John. Simson Garfinkel has another one worth adding to the
> list, but I'm blanking on it for the life of me right now -- give me a
> day or two to dig through my pile of papers and I'll come up with it.
For once, I conquered my paper s
On 08/24/2012 07:13 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> Gaw, S., Felten, E. W., and Fernandez-Kelly, P. 2006. Secrecy,
> flagging, and paranoia: adoption criteria in encrypted email.
(other citations clipped)
Thank you, John. Simson Garfinkel has another one worth adding to the
list, but I'm blanking on it
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 08:24 AM, peter.segm...@wronghead.com wrote:
>> I propose to you (and to the people who are putting all that hard
>> work into gpg) that there are actually two "things killing PKI":
>
> At risk of sounding dismissive, I really don't care what your pet theory
On 24 August 2012 14:24, wrote:
> On 23/08/12 17:07, Robert J. Hansen - r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
>
>>
>> Deploying PKI is nowhere near as big of a problem as convincing people
>> that PKI adds benefit to their lives.
>>
>
> and
>
> Right now the number one thing killing PKI is the fact nobody
On 08/24/2012 08:24 AM, peter.segm...@wronghead.com wrote:
> I propose to you (and to the people who are putting all that hard
> work into gpg) that there are actually two "things killing PKI":
At risk of sounding dismissive, I really don't care what your pet theory
is until such time as you get o
On 24/08/12 06:55, Faramir - faramir...@gmail.com wrote:
You are welcome, lets add more comments.
your comments are appreciated.
This group's (C-Z/SUV) thinking on the role of a "group manager"
has evolved. I believe for the better.
GPG is on the other hand so tightly integrated with WOT
On 23/08/12 17:07, Robert J. Hansen - r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
Deploying PKI is nowhere near as big of a problem as convincing people
that PKI adds benefit to their lives.
and
Right now the number one thing killing PKI is the fact nobody wants to
adopt it. If you state, "well, before som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 22-08-2012 14:59, peter.segm...@wronghead.com escribió:
> Thank you for your comprehensive comments,
You are welcome, lets add more comments.
> On 22/08/12 03:16, Faramir - faramir...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I think you are wrong about that. All t
12 matches
Mail list logo
