Re: how vulnerable is "hidden-encrypt-to"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hauke Laging wrote: > Am Fr 17.08.2012, 21:05:32 schrieb auto15963931: > >> In the example >> of yours it appears as though the message was encrypted to two different >> keys, one of which was hidden and the other not. Is that right? > > That is righ

Re: how vulnerable is "hidden-encrypt-to"

Am Fr 17.08.2012, 21:05:32 schrieb auto15963931: > In the example > of yours it appears as though the message was encrypted to two different > keys, one of which was hidden and the other not. Is that right? That is right. --hidden-encrypt-to needs other recipients. But you may use ‑‑throw-keyids

Re: how vulnerable is "hidden-encrypt-to"

Hauke Laging: > Am Fr 17.08.2012, 09:56:56 schrieb auto15963931: >> Is there any way on heaven or earth for someone to discover from a >> message, one sent to them or to another person, whether the encrypted >> message had been made with an option "hidden-encrypt-to" > > Sure. > > start cmd:> LC_

[no subject]

http://ryanestradaphotosblog.com/wp-content/themes/twentyten/test.php?riding227.php___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: how vulnerable is "hidden-encrypt-to"

Am Fr 17.08.2012, 09:56:56 schrieb auto15963931: > Is there any way on heaven or earth for someone to discover from a > message, one sent to them or to another person, whether the encrypted > message had been made with an option "hidden-encrypt-to" Sure. start cmd:> LC_ALL=C gpg --list-packets te

how vulnerable is "hidden-encrypt-to"

Is there any way on heaven or earth for someone to discover from a message, one sent to them or to another person, whether the encrypted message had been made with an option "hidden-encrypt-to" or what key ID had been used in conjunction with that option? Thanks. _