Cross-compiling GPGME

I have a small Qt application that uses GPGME. It compiles cleanly under Linux (on a Fedora 17/x64 setup). Although F17 has a really lovely mingw32 cross-compiler, and a pre-built libgpg-error for Win32 that I can use, it's missing gpgme -- meaning I need to cross-compile my own, so that the ming

Re: GPA and hkps

John wrote: > "Werner Koch" wrote in message > news:<87lijbfbzk.fsf__7982.15741892836$1340651488$gmane$o...@vigenere.g10code.de>... >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 23:22, jw72...@verizon.net said: >> >> > message when I use GPA to try retrieving a key. The message states >> > this: "There is no plugin ava

Re: ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking (Andy Ruddock)

>Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:54:16 +0100 >From: Andy Ruddock >I just set up a free hushmail account, using the web interface you >don't >get an In-Reply-To field in the header. >I couldn't find any settings which would enable this. >So, if you're using a free hushmail account then I guess you're

pipe passphrase to unlock key

Hell all, I am trying to pipe my passphrase to unlock the key. my problem is like this, when I use git to sign a tag gnupg ask for the passphrase and i need to pipe the passphrase. I try echo "my long passphrase" | git tag -s 1.0.0.42 -m 'version 1.0.0.1' however it did not work. i also try wr

Re: ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: > > ok > > changed to individual digest mode, and replying directly > (hushmail default of 'reply' is to individual user and cc to list) > > hope it works, > > if not, any other suggestions to try in hushmail? > > TIA

Re: ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:34:02 -0400 Peter Lebbing wrote: >and you get an interface where you can change such settings. ok changed to individual digest mode, and replying directly (hushmail default of 'reply' is to individual user and cc to list) hope it works, if not, any other suggestions to

Re: ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking

On 27/06/12 17:14, Brad Rogers wrote: > Sadly, with mailman, unsubbing and resubbing is the only way for a > regular user to change their subscription format. Having switched from digest to individual message mode myself about a year ago, I can tell you you are mistaken. I did it succesfully in th

Re: ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking

On 27/06/12 16:30, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: > btw, > how do I change from 'digest-mode' to 'individual-list mode'? Go to , enter your e-mail address and password you subscribed with, and you get an interface where you can change such settings.

Re: idea.dll

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:32:17 -0600 Aaron Toponce wrote: Hello Aaron, >Please fix your client. I don't know if you can tell, but you are >breaking the threads. Your client should support the 'in-reply-to' and vedaa is using Hushmail; A web mail system. -- Regards _ / ) "

Re: ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:30:30 -0400 ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: Hello ved...@nym.hush.com, Unfortunately, as you suspected, the message I'm replying to did break threading. It's Hushmail that's at fault, I believe. >does it require unsubscribing and re-subscribing, >or is there an easier way? Sa

Re: migration paths from SHA-1 [was: Re: idea.dll]

On 6/27/2012 10:24 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > For the key's fingerprint specifically, a pre-image (where the attacker > crafts a new text that shares a digest with the victim's key material) > is the thing to worry about, not a crafted collision (where the attacker > generates two texts that

Re: ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:33:38 -0400 Aaron Toponce wrote: >On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:44:11PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:12, aaron.topo...@gmail.com said: >> > So, if >Thus, the reason I began with 'if'. :) Am using Hushmail (have been using it since it came out) and a

migration paths from SHA-1 [was: Re: idea.dll]

On 06/27/2012 09:11 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 6/26/2012 3:22 AM, Werner Koch wrote: >> This is very different in OpenPGP. SHA-1 is not used everywhere; its >> main use is for the fingerprint, this will eventually be a problem. > > I am not so sanguine. Marc Stevens claims [1] he has a wor

Re: idea.dll

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:12:12AM -0400, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: > it will be interesting to see if V4 keys will be gracefully > abandoned as SHA1 becomes as broken as MD5, > > or if there will be die-hards holding onto they their V4 keys no > matter what ... Please fix your client. I don'

Re: ideal.dll

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:44:11PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:12, aaron.topo...@gmail.com said: > > So, if the system can be improved by removing support for PGP2, which > > includes cleaning up code, squashing bugs, and tightening security, then > > why is it still around?

Re: idea.dll

On 6/26/2012 3:22 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > This is very different in OpenPGP. SHA-1 is not used everywhere; its > main use is for the fingerprint, this will eventually be a problem. I am not so sanguine. Marc Stevens claims [1] he has a working collision requiring 2**57 compressions: that number