-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Friends of John W. Moore III
You may recall that John's mother unexpectedly died on 6 Jul 2010 and
that along with the unexpected complexities of probating her estate and
some other things resulted in his having to reluctantly terminate h
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Nicholas Sushkin wrote:
> Hi, I think there is a bug in the way KMail is doing S/Mime envelop
> for signed but not encrypted messages. I'd like to follow through,
> but I am not sure if it's gnupg or KMail, which is the proper forum.
> Does anyone (Werner) know by any
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:48, nsush...@sushkins.net said:
> Hi, I think there is a bug in the way KMail is doing S/Mime envelop for
> signed
> but not encrypted messages. I'd like to follow through, but I am not sure if
> it's gnupg or KMail, which is the proper forum. Does anyone (Werner) know by
Hi, I think there is a bug in the way KMail is doing S/Mime envelop for signed
but not encrypted messages. I'd like to follow through, but I am not sure if
it's gnupg or KMail, which is the proper forum. Does anyone (Werner) know by
any chance?
Thanks.
ps. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hi, Aaron,
KMail 2.1.1 KDE 4.6.5 gpgsm (GnuPG) 2.0.17 libgcrypt 1.4.6 libksba 1.2.0
I send a signed unencrypted email. iPad and Outlook-web recipients cannot see
the body of my email, only seeing the smime.p7m attachment. I am getting angry
responses implying to stop using SMIME. I am looking a
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:48:35AM -0500, Nicholas Sushkin wrote:
> Hi, I think there is a bug in the way KMail is doing S/Mime envelop for signed
> but not encrypted messages. I'd like to follow through, but I am not sure if
> it's gnupg or KMail, which is the proper forum. Does anyone (Werner) kn
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:26:49PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> Noteworthy changes already found in beta2:
>
> * ECC support for GPG as described by draft-jivsov-openpgp-ecc-06.txt.
Eager for this. Will we be seeing ECC support in 1.4.x?
--
. o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
. . o . o o o
Hi, I think there is a bug in the way KMail is doing S/Mime envelop for signed
but not encrypted messages. I'd like to follow through, but I am not sure if
it's gnupg or KMail, which is the proper forum. Does anyone (Werner) know by
any chance?
Thanks.
ps. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Christmas is upon us. This is traditionally a time for family, charity,
giving and thankfulness. For myself, I'm thankful for GnuPG and all the
work that Werner and others have put into it -- as are many of us.
Let's remember them this holiday season and put out a big round of
"thank you"s.
Furt
Hi,
Has anyone had any luck in getting Digipass 920 to work with GnuPG and OpenPGP
smartcards?
It has a pin-entry keypad and seems to work fine for doing a --card-status, but
not for example signing:
"gpg: signing failed: Conditions of use not satisfied" after getting the normal
pin entry win
> The solution is to use different gpg calls for the two keys.
That is exactly what I thought about, I just hoped there is a simplier way.
> If somebody is capable of faking your signatures why shouldn't he
> be able to fake anything else (which you take as a proof of origin)
> like sending an em
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:24, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
> I see that the man page still refers to the option --secret-keyring.
> Presumably this option now does nothing?
Right, it is a NOP. It is still there so you are able to use the same
gpg.conf for all versions of GnuPG. I will fix the doc
12 matches
Mail list logo
