Re: STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption

2011-10-21 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 20 October 2011 at 10:04:15 AM, in , Werner Koch wrote: > Most users don't have personal web pages. So what now? > Well many users have a facebook page - but this would > make facebook mandatory and we woold need support from > th

Re: STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption

2011-10-21 Thread Christophe Brocas
Le 21/10/2011 16:12, Jean-David Beyer a écrit : > Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > >> What about making everyone their own provider? The efforts in this >> direction intiated by Eben Moglen that lead to the FreedomBox and other >> projects seem to go in the right direction. It doesn't seem to me les

Re: STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption

2011-10-21 Thread Jean-David Beyer
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > > What about making everyone their own provider? The efforts in this > direction intiated by Eben Moglen that lead to the FreedomBox and other > projects seem to go in the right direction. It doesn't seem to me less > realistic than requiring cooperation from provi

Re: STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption

2011-10-21 Thread Johan Wevers
On 20-10-2011 22:25, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > What about making everyone their own provider? Is that technically equivalent to running your own mailserver? Because that also gives some problems: I run my own server at vulcan.xs4all.nl (bsmtp at a subdomain of my provider) but get some mail

Re: STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption

2011-10-21 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:16:01AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On 10/19/2011 09:30 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > > However, I think you're not ambitious enough when you opt for using DNS for > > key > > distribution. Yes, the infrastructure and RR types[1] are already there. > > But it > > brin

Re: STEED - Usable end-to-end encryption

2011-10-21 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:46, marcus.brinkm...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de said: > not ask for data that is not available for whatever reason. I think your > interpretation of the regulations in that area is overly pessimistic, but I > could be wrong. Maybe you can verify this? Actually the German Federal