On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> I have a particular concern that if I sign a key with "I checked
> carefully" that I really did. Moreover, I have a philosophical prejudice
> that if I *can't* say "I checked carefully," why bother?
>
> That said, I have in the past run across
I use gpg4win on my windows systems, and I can live with the gnupg
version being a little stale. But I'm trying really hard to like
claws-mail, and they just release a new version today making the one in
gpg4 win 2 versions behind the curve. Maybe you were just waiting for
today's claws release? :)
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 00:46, sand...@crustytoothpaste.net said:
> dpkg-source would lose the ability to verify packages before unpacking
> them. apt's archive verification would break. That doesn't include
Wrong. It uses gpgv which is a verification only tool; is uses a list
of trusted keys (i.e