Re: gpg-agent troubles

2011-03-26 Thread kapetr
Thanks for replay and explanation: - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA - Od: "Werner Koch" Komu: "kapetr" Předmět: Re: gpg-agent troubles Datum: 24.3.2011 - 21:00:17 > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:40, kap...@mizera.cz said: > > > 1. gpg-agent ignores changed values in > > ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf after > > >

Re: [PGPNET] Jerome

2011-03-26 Thread Grant Olson
On 03/26/2011 02:16 PM, Lance W. Haverkamp wrote: > On 03/26/2011 11:23 AM, Jerome Baum wrote: >> Werner Koch writes: >> >>> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:50, jer...@jeromebaum.com said: >> summarize: gpg-agent seems to have problems handling thrown keyids. >> >>> You mean the current development ve

Re: [PGPNET] Jerome

2011-03-26 Thread Lance W. Haverkamp
On 03/26/2011 11:23 AM, Jerome Baum wrote: > Werner Koch writes: > >> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:50, jer...@jeromebaum.com said: > >>> summarize: gpg-agent seems to have problems handling thrown keyids. > >> You mean the current development version? Quite possible; that is for >> what development

Re: gpg-agent throw-id issue (was: [PGPNET] Jerome)

2011-03-26 Thread Ben McGinnes
On 27/03/11 4:07 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:50, jer...@jeromebaum.com said: > >> summarize: gpg-agent seems to have problems handling thrown keyids. > > You mean the current development version? Quite possible; that is > for what development versions are for. > > For 2.0.x

Re: [PGPNET] Jerome

2011-03-26 Thread Jerome Baum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Werner Koch writes: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:50, jer...@jeromebaum.com said: > >> summarize: gpg-agent seems to have problems handling thrown keyids. > > You mean the current development version? Quite possible; that is for > what development vers

Re: [PGPNET] Jerome

2011-03-26 Thread Werner Koch
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:50, jer...@jeromebaum.com said: > summarize: gpg-agent seems to have problems handling thrown keyids. You mean the current development version? Quite possible; that is for what development versions are for. For 2.0.x there can't be a problem because gpg-agent does not kno

Re: [PGPNET] Jerome

2011-03-26 Thread Jerome Baum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 MFPA writes: >> Are you implying something? Also, while I can't try >> this myself (using gpg1), would be good if someone >> would file a bug report. > > And maybe discus it on GnuPG-Users... Good point. CC'ing them so we can continue the discussi

Re: empty file generated when running GPG batch

2011-03-26 Thread jb1111
Hi Jerome thanks for the response. Lee had the solution (add %%F to end of line). I appreciate all the suggests. Jerome Baum-2 wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > jb writes: > >> Hi. It outputs a same named .pgp file. When decrypted, it's empty. I >> trie