Grant Olson wrote:
> On 3/17/11 4:43 PM, Andrew Long wrote:
>> Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've
>> tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and get
>> DOMAIN (not known)
>>
>
> There were a few emails on sks-devel this morning. Apparentl
* Andrew Long [110317 21:47, mID
<7871bbee-1f8d-4efc-b0f3-9a17ec4ce...@mac.com>]:
> Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've
> tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and
> get DOMAIN (not known)
By now, I at least get NS records again, but
Andrew Long wrote the following on 3/17/11 4:43 PM:
> Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've
> tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and
> get DOMAIN (not known)
>
> Regards, Andy
Was down two hours ago, still down now 5:30 PM DST.
Char
On 3/17/11 4:43 PM, Andrew Long wrote:
> Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've
> tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and get
> DOMAIN (not known)
>
There were a few emails on sks-devel this morning. Apparently it is
indeed down.
http://
Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've
tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and
get DOMAIN (not known)
Regards, Andy
--
Andrew Long
andrew dot long at mac dot com
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Op 15-3-2011 21:57, Ingo Klöcker schreef:
> > Why migrate away? Even if GnuPG 3 stops supporting RFC1991 there
> > will always be GnuPG 1 and GnuPG 2 around to decrypt ancient data
> > and verify signatures made decades ago.
>
> If that is the case
Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/17/11 3:41 PM:
> On Thursday 17 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when the user's locale is e.g. French, and she/he is generating a key
>> in Terminal (or DOS prompt, if that's what it is called in Windows),
>> is the interactive dialogue displayed
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:15:45AM +0100, Johan Wevers wrote:
> > Op 15-3-2011 21:32, Ben McGinnes schreef:
> > > That's probably a worthwhile discussion to have. Even if RFC1991
> > > support is maintained, there's still value in migrating encrypt
On Thursday 17 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when the user's locale is e.g. French, and she/he is generating a key
> in Terminal (or DOS prompt, if that's what it is called in Windows),
> is the interactive dialogue displayed in French (or in the language
> of the user's locale)?
> D
Hi,
when the user's locale is e.g. French, and she/he is generating a key in
Terminal (or DOS prompt, if that's what it is called in Windows), is
the interactive dialogue displayed in French (or in the language of the
user's locale)?
Ditto for all other gpg interactive dialogues.
Thanks,
Charly
Am Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:02:43 +0100
schrieb Werner Koch :
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:31, malte.g...@gmx.de said:
>
> > currently I have some trouble to get my Cyberjack running with
> > PCSC. So I wonder, can GnuPG (2.0.16) also work with CTAPI drivers?
>
> I doubt that. CTAPI has not been used fo
Is PGP/ENIGMAIL compatible with folks using Outlook or Microsoft Mail
with PGP Desktop?
I've tried searching for this but no luck,-- :-(
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Op 16-3-2011 17:38, ved...@nym.hush.com schreef:
> I've had a problem running Disastry's PGP 2.6.3 multi6 on 64 bit
> windows systems, because the DOS command line window didn't work
> with even Disastry's 32 bit pgp.exe.
That is because his executables are DOS executables and not win32
command
13 matches
Mail list logo
