On 12/29/2010 4:03 PM, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote:
> Ah snap...yes only inline coding, no PGP/MIME as far as the guys know.
> We're using Linux and recent versions of gpg such as 1.4.9 and newer.
Makes it a lot easier. Yeah, your best bet here is probably some
scripted solution. Shouldn't be
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 12:10 PM, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote:
> > Someone said we should write a script to parse all the messages into
> > individual files and then do gpg on each one and that's what i'll do
> > if there isn't a way to get gpg to scan the whole file.
>
> We
On 12/29/2010 09:10, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote:
Hi,
Occasionally I get a big file of encrypted emails with mail headers
stripped out. All thats in the file is the begin and end PGP marks and all
the encrypted armored text in between. Some are encrypted to me, others to
my coworkers. Sometime
On 12/29/2010 12:10 PM, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote:
> Someone said we should write a script to parse all the messages into
> individual files and then do gpg on each one and that's what i'll do
> if there isn't a way to get gpg to scan the whole file.
We will have an easier time helping you if
Hi,
Occasionally I get a big file of encrypted emails with mail headers
stripped out. All thats in the file is the begin and end PGP marks and all
the encrypted armored text in between. Some are encrypted to me, others to
my coworkers. Sometimes if I do gpg filename it finds all my mails and asks
I am using the 1.4.11 binary for windows. I would like to know if it is
thread-safe?
I am deploying this in a production machine where multiple instance of
gpg will be called simultaneously for encrypting and decrypting.
Thanks,
-Julius
__
