On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 16:33 -0800, Paul Richard Ramer wrote:
> Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:07:13 +0100, Mike wrote:
> > I use IMAP for my mailbox and I am accessing this from Win/Outlook and
> > Ubuntu/Evolution.
> >
> > When I get an email and I access it first with Outlook, then I can not
> > verify the
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:44:56 +, Lee Elcocks wrote:
> I have finaly managed to import PKSC12 files into GPGSM. Is their a
> way of importing OpenPGP keys into GPGSM?
No. GPGSM is for CMS and S/MIME; GnuPG is for OpenPGP and PGP/MIME.
> The client insists that we use RSA keys using openSSL and bu
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:07:13 +0100, Mike wrote:
> I use IMAP for my mailbox and I am accessing this from Win/Outlook and
> Ubuntu/Evolution.
>
> When I get an email and I access it first with Outlook, then I can not
> verify the signature anymore in Ubuntu as the whole email got detached
> into a sep
On Wednesday 24 November 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 13:38, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Monday 15 November 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> >> On 11/15/2010 3:19 PM, Scott Lambdin wrote:
> >>> If I have a base 64 exported PGP key, how can I extract the
> >>>
> >>> descriptive data
On 25/11/10 5:05 AM, Michael Fladerer wrote:
>
> The gpg manpage says:
>
> (...)
> --keyring file
>Add file to the current list of keyrings. (...)
>
>If the intent is to use the specified keyring alone, use --keyring
>along with --no-default-keyring.
>
> HTH.
Oh, cool
On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:57 AM, Imran Khan wrote:
> Hi,
> Can some one please guide what is the difference between ownertrust and
> minimum_ownertrust?
> My understanding is that ownertrust is explicitly assigned to a key while,
> minimum_ownertrust is computed from trust signatures on the key.Hav
On Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 00:53:32 +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 24/11/10 10:35 PM, Aaron Berthold wrote:
>
> > Alternatively, is there a way to work with multiple-but-distinct
> > keyrings without manually renaming the files and restarting the software
> > when you want to switch? So I could have
On 24/11/10 10:35 PM, Aaron Berthold wrote:
> In the last few months, I've become comfortable enough with GnuPG (using
> TB+Enigmail) for personal, small scale use but there are a couple of use
> cases I've yet to find good solutions to. I figured the people here on
> the List would know. ^_^
>
>
On 2010-11-24 14:29, kardan wrote:
> Maybe the orphaned gpgkeys is of help.
Hmmm, while it's a nicely fast GUI, it doesn't really seem to do what i
need. (Or at least I haven't found out how. So far it seems like a
normal GPG frontend like GPA.
> You can specify the keyfile as option like for gpg
Hi Werner,
Sorry to bother you with this but we upgraded to 1.4.11 and now have a
serious problem...
Let me give you some background information... we have three scripts
that run during the day:
1 - Scripts to decrypt files...
2 - Script to encrypt archive files with our key (American rules abo
In the last few months, I've become comfortable enough with GnuPG (using
TB+Enigmail) for personal, small scale use but there are a couple of use
cases I've yet to find good solutions to. I figured the people here on
the List would know. ^_^
The basic issue is organizing the keys in my pubkey list
Hi,
Can some one please guide what is the difference between ownertrust and
minimum_ownertrust?
My understanding is that ownertrust is explicitly assigned to a key while,
minimum_ownertrust is computed from trust signatures on the key.Have
I interpreted it correctly?
If this is the case, what is th
Hi,
Can some one please guide what is the difference between ownertrust and
minimum_ownertrust?
My understanding is that ownertrust is explicitly assigned to a key while,
minimum_ownertrust is computed from trust signatures(tsign) on the key.Have
I interpreted it correctly?
If this is the case, wha
On 24/11/10 18:49, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:31,al...@archlinux.org said:
> 1) I would have expected the trust level to be something like
> TRUST_FULL rather than TRUST_UNDEFINED. Is this because I have no
> signatures on that key or more specifically because I have no
> u
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:31, al...@archlinux.org said:
> 1) I would have expected the trust level to be something like
> TRUST_FULL rather than TRUST_UNDEFINED. Is this because I have no
> signatures on that key or more specifically because I have no
> ultimately trusted key in the keyring signing
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:34, l...@gmx.at said:
> However I find that OpenVPN does not have support for the card yet. :/
> So I am forced to use scute, a PKCS #11 implementation for the OpenPGP
> card.
> Now my question is: would this work? Has anybody tried this successfully?
It may not work instan
16 matches
Mail list logo
