On 3/19/2010 7:39 PM, Jerry wrote:
> It must be that time of year again; birds sing, flowers bloom and
> broken 'vacation' message auto responders flourish. In any case, I am
> calling the number he published. Maybe they can fix the 'vacation
> message' apparatus.
More often than not, these sorts
On 3/19/2010 7:09 PM, James Moe wrote:
> On 03/19/2010 02:30 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
>>> Tbird v3.0.3, gnupg v2.0.12, enigmail v1.0.1
>>>
>>> I have started gpg-agent, have exported the variables from
>>> <.gpg-agent.info>. Yet every time I save enigmail's preferences I get
>>> the message "...to ch
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:06:26 -0600
Richard Hamilton articulated:
>I am out of the office until 03/22/2010.
>
>I am out of the office until Monday March 21st. If this is a
>production problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or
>email Bob Olson at robert.ol...@williams.com. I will
On 3/19/2010 5:36 PM, FederalHill wrote:
> Are there refernces where such procedures are detailed that I might look at?
http://scholar.google.com
Check for "encrypted database rekeying".
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Gnup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/2010 02:30 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
>> Tbird v3.0.3, gnupg v2.0.12, enigmail v1.0.1
>>
>> I have started gpg-agent, have exported the variables from
>> <.gpg-agent.info>. Yet every time I save enigmail's preferences I get
>> the message "...to c
I am out of the office until 03/22/2010.
I am out of the office until Monday March 21st. If this is a production
problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or email Bob Olson
at robert.ol...@williams.com. I will have limited mail and cell phone
access.
Note: This is an automated
Are there refernces where such procedures are detailed that I might look at?
--- On Fri, 3/19/10, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
From: Robert J. Hansen
Subject: Re: Secure unattended decryption
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: Friday, March 19, 2010, 5:30 PM
On 3/19/2010 4:26 PM, egg...@gmail.co
On Mar 19, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Juergen Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody tried to decrypt a symmetric gpg encryption with Java
> using Java Cryptography Architecture included in the JDK?
>
> echo hello | gpg -c --cipher-algo 3DES -a --passphrase "my pass" |
> java MyDeCrypt --cipher-algo 3DES --
Hi,
has anybody tried to decrypt a symmetric gpg encryption with Java
using Java Cryptography Architecture included in the JDK?
echo hello | gpg -c --cipher-algo 3DES -a --passphrase "my pass" |
java MyDeCrypt --cipher-algo 3DES --passphrase "my pass"
should result in hello
This should be poss
On 3/19/2010 3:32 PM, James Moe wrote:
> Tbird v3.0.3, gnupg v2.0.12, enigmail v1.0.1
>
> I have started gpg-agent, have exported the variables from
> <.gpg-agent.info>. Yet every time I save enigmail's preferences I get
> the message "...to change passphrase caching options, please configure
> yo
On 3/19/2010 4:26 PM, egg...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yes, well, changing the AES key on a database (Which may be several
> hundred gigabytes) is time consuming.
Only if you design your database poorly. This is a solved problem in
both database design and filesystem design.
smime.p7s
Description: S/
On 3/19/2010 1:17 PM, M.B.Jr. wrote:
>>
>> The encryption key for the databases is stored on-disk, encrypted with PGP
>> (Gnupg specifically).
>
>
> Sort of a conceptual remark at this point.
>
> See, this database password you refer to is a symmetrical one. And you
> stated you keep it on-disk,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:17:12PM -0300, M.B.Jr. wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Daniel Eggleston wrote:
> > I know it's sort of a contradiction in terms, but hear me out:
> >
> > The case I'm looking at is a High Availability environment hosting a
> > database. The d
Tbird v3.0.3, gnupg v2.0.12, enigmail v1.0.1
I have started gpg-agent, have exported the variables from
<.gpg-agent.info>. Yet every time I save enigmail's preferences I get
the message "...to change passphrase caching options, please configure
your gpg-agent tool."
Hmm. Which settings must be co
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Daniel Eggleston wrote:
> I know it's sort of a contradiction in terms, but hear me out:
>
> The case I'm looking at is a High Availability environment hosting a
> database. The database is comprised of many Unix files, encrypted via AES,
> on shared s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 19 March 2010 at 6:54:06 AM, in
, Paul Richard Ramer wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:05:21 + MFPA wrote:
>> It looks to me as if the answer is "yes." Unless each
>> person who had one of your email addresses already
>> knew the o
tname... Macintosh.local
configure: autobuild timestamp... 20100319-094319
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... /usr/bin/gcc-4.0
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling..
17 matches
Mail list logo
