Re: key question

2010-03-07 Thread Paul Richard Ramer
MFPA wrote: >> In each of these cases, John Doe made the mistake of thinking that >> he could keep his personal information in his key, and that he could >> keep his key off the keyservers. If John were to make the wisest >> decision about keeping his personal informaton secret, wouldn't he >> choo

Re: key question

2010-03-07 Thread Paul Richard Ramer
Hello MFPA, I will summarize the "rights" and restrictions that I believe you say that an OpenPGP user has with another's public key. I will call this the rules of "Key Rights Management" or KRM for short. Rights of the Key Originator * Can restrict the uploading of

Re: key question

2010-03-07 Thread Paul Richard Ramer
MFPA wrote: > On Saturday 6 March 2010 at 8:55:48 AM, you wrote: > > >> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:52:02 + MFPA wrote: (b) the person owns the information has the right to control how it is disseminated, and > > This was someone's re-interpretation of my point. Spot the extra ">"? Hel

Re[2]: Memory forensics

2010-03-07 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi John On Friday 5 March 2010 at 9:42:53 PM, you wrote: > Most 'Hibernators' I know are laptop/notebook/netbook Users who are too > important to wait for boot-up when the unit is Opened. :-D Did you mean "important" rather than "impatient?"

how to suppress warning about gpg-agent?

2010-03-07 Thread Alex Efros
Hi! Looks like we need an option to suppress warning about gpg-agent. > Long story: I've a lot of projects (each has separate user account) which use gpg for encrypting daily backups (from cron) in this way: gpg --batch --cipher-algo AES256 -c --passphrase-file PASSFILE BACKUP.tar The probl

Re[2]: key question

2010-03-07 Thread MFPA
Hi Mark On Thursday 4 March 2010 at 5:25:09 PM, you wrote: > Were I the individual, I would think long and hard about using a tool > which would require me to defeat its features that create identity > labels (however false or information-poor) and carry them along with > the message. I would

Re[4]: key question

2010-03-07 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi David On Sunday 7 March 2010 at 5:53:51 PM, you wrote: > On Mar 7, 2010, at 11:46 AM, MFPA wrote: >> (And yes, I know gpg now >> allows you to omit the email address without having to use --expert, >> but you are still asked for it.) > There

Re: Re[2]: key question

2010-03-07 Thread David Shaw
On Mar 7, 2010, at 11:46 AM, MFPA wrote: > The default configurations of PGP and gpg ask for a name, email > address, and comment when you create a key. Last time I looked (v8.x), > PGP would not even create a key without something that looked like an > email address - hence the a...@b.c in my UID

Re[2]: key question

2010-03-07 Thread MFPA
Hi Paul On Saturday 6 March 2010 at 8:54:41 AM, you wrote: > Hello MFPA, > During this whole debate, you have assumed one thing in your argument > that I don't believe anyone has pointed out as being flawed. You have > assumed that the person (I will call him John Doe) would have decided > to

gpg-preset-passphrase

2010-03-07 Thread Daniel Eggleston
I'm looking for some help explaining the behavior of gpg-preset-passphrase. First, the manpage states: Passphrases set with this utility don't expire unless the --forget option is used to explicitly clear them from the cache --- or gpg-agent is either restarted or reloade