>
> Thanks a million for all this. The company "Volatile Systems" was
> really messing with my google-fu.
Err -- why?
Volatile Systems is behind the Volatility framework, which is probably the best
FOSS tool going right now for Windows memory analysis. (Admittedly, it only
works on Windows X
>From what I understand, the v1.1 cards had a max pin length of 254
characters.
Is this not the case with the newer v2.0 cards? My v2.0 card shows Max.
PIN lengths .: 32 32 32.
Is this a setting that can be changed? I didn't see anything in
card-edit, and have I been digging around online, but ha
On 03/05/2010 05:18 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 3/5/10 5:04 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
>> That article was a little vague. And I don't know much about memory
>> forensics in practice. Do you know that it actually was a hibernation
>> file and not swap space?
>
> Note Jesse's phrasing: "volatile
On 3/5/10 5:04 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
> That article was a little vague. And I don't know much about memory
> forensics in practice. Do you know that it actually was a hibernation
> file and not swap space?
Note Jesse's phrasing: "volatile memory forensics." Swap space is
nonvolatile storage.
On 3/5/2010 4:30 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> http://jessekornblum.livejournal.com/259124.html
>
> For quite some time we've known that hibernation files present risks for
> information security. However, there are always those who say "until I
> see an actual demonstration, I won't believe it."
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> http://jessekornblum.livejournal.com/259124.html
>
> For quite some time we've known that hibernation files present risks for
> information security. However, there are always those who say "until I
> see an actual demonst
http://jessekornblum.livejournal.com/259124.html
For quite some time we've known that hibernation files present risks for
information security. However, there are always those who say "until I
see an actual demonstration, I won't believe it."
The upshot: we now have an actual demonstration. The
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 01:30 AM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
>> The gpg --list-sig shows that the keys are signed. Do I need to create a
>> new signature key, and re-sign all the public keys that I imported?
>
> I think the simplest thing for you to do is to modify the ownertrust of
>
Folks
Thanks for your suggestions. They worked.
Regards,
Cathy
---
Cathy L. Smith
IT Engineer
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Phone: 509.375.2687
Fax: 509.375.2330
Email: cathy.sm...@pnl.gov
-Original Message-
From: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org [mailto:gnupg-use
On Mar 5, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:13:17PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
>> On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>>
>>> Reading RFC 4880 (OpenPGP standard), if I am able to decrypt the session
>>> key, it should be possible to create a new Pu
On 3/5/10 9:51 AM, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> I will now have a look at how things are organised in GnuPG code.
> Would you suggest that I look at the GnuPG 1 or GnuPG 2 code?
If memory serves, the codebases are identical with respect to this.
Shouldn't matter which one you use.
> And if I succeed
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:13:17PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>
> > Reading RFC 4880 (OpenPGP standard), if I am able to decrypt the session
> > key, it should be possible to create a new Public-Key Encrypted Session
> > Key packet to allow a ne
On 03/05/2010 01:30 AM, Smith, Cathy wrote:
> The gpg --list-sig shows that the keys are signed. Do I need to create a
> new signature key, and re-sign all the public keys that I imported?
I think the simplest thing for you to do is to modify the ownertrust of
your old signing key on the new in
On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:39 AM, John W. Moore III wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Laurent Jumet wrote:
>>
>> Hello Smith, !
>>
>> "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
>>
>>> I've tried using the --yes option without success to suppress this
>>> interactive prompt doesn't pop up.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Laurent Jumet wrote:
>
> Hello Smith, !
>
> "Smith, Cathy" wrote:
>
>> I've tried using the --yes option without success to suppress this
>> interactive prompt doesn't pop up. This encryption does need to run in a
>> batch job. What do I need t
15 matches
Mail list logo