On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:37:03PM -0700, littleBrain wrote:
> And I see, error and the decrypted message (stdOut??) is spewed out in the
> body.
>
> I would like to separate these error messages to bottom of the message and
> standard decrypted output to the top of the body.
>
> Could someone p
On 06/25/2009 06:30 AM, Alexander Delau wrote:
> I'm a beginner in encrypting E-Mails. It would bei nice if you could help me
> in my question:
>
> I want to use GnuPG with a masterkey (to sign) and a subkey (to encrypt) on
> Windows XP (GnuPG 1.4.9) and Ubuntu (GnuPG ?.?.?).
>
> Now I'm not sure
On Jun 25, 2009, at 6:30 AM, Alexander Delau wrote:
I'm a beginner in encrypting E-Mails. It would bei nice if you could
help me
in my question:
I want to use GnuPG with a masterkey (to sign) and a subkey (to
encrypt) on
Windows XP (GnuPG 1.4.9) and Ubuntu (GnuPG ?.?.?).
Now I'm not sur
I'm a beginner in encrypting E-Mails. It would bei nice if you could help me
in my question:
I want to use GnuPG with a masterkey (to sign) and a subkey (to encrypt) on
Windows XP (GnuPG 1.4.9) and Ubuntu (GnuPG ?.?.?).
Now I'm not sure, what keys i should use after typing "gpg --gen-key
--exper
Alexander Delau wrote:
> Now I'm not sure, what keys i should use after typing "gpg --gen-key
> --expert" and what keys are secure.
Beginners should:
1. Avoid the "--expert" flag
2. Use the defaults
GnuPG is meant to be as straightforward as possible for new users. You
don't
I'd like manually verify attached application/pgp-signature signatures
in email. I have access to the raw (undecoded) email, and I read
through RFC 3156, but I'm still getting BAD signatures. I've tried
verifying a couple of different signatures from various lists, and the
example given in the RFC,
Hi All,
I am newbie to GPG.
I have got an application where it uses the following command to decrypt GPG
encrypted messages.
/usr/local/bin/gpg --no-tty --passphrase-fd 0 -d /tmp/testXX.gpg
This often (at least rarely) returns an error. One such example is:
Decrypted message body
=-=-=-=-
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Kahn
Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/24/2009 11:06 AM, Brian Mearns wrote:
>> GPGME just invokes gnupg in a subshell, right? And parses the
>> response? Not that this won't work, it just seems so inelegant.
>
> Communicating a well-defined syntax across a process bou
Hello,
there has been released an new version of WinPT.
Info: http://winpt.gnupt.de
--
Barry
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
