On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:41:11PM -0700, Harry wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I ran into a problem when using gpg to sign and encrypt. I have a test
> run below (in bash):
Not really 100% usable yet, but the correct solution to this is the
server mode accessed via --command-fd.
IIRC VERIFY and MESSAGE
On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:41 PM, Harry wrote:
Hello guys,
I ran into a problem when using gpg to sign and encrypt. I have a
test run below (in bash):
$echo abcd | gpg -u b...@xyz.com --output message.pgp -r
al...@123.com -se --passphrase-fd 0 << EOF
<123456
There is no error but after decry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 22:25, quoth Joe Korn:
> Hi Harry,
>
> We ran into the same problem and the only way we were able to get around it
> was by storing the pass phrase in a file and using the TYPE command instead
> of the echo. Curious to see if anyone else
On 06/18/2009 08:41 PM, Harry wrote:
> $echo abcd | gpg -u b...@xyz.com --output message.pgp -r al...@123.com -se
> --passphrase-fd 0 << EOF
> 123456
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.
Hi Harry,
We ran into the same problem and the only way we were able to get
around it was by storing the pass phrase in a file and using the TYPE
command instead of the echo. Curious to see if anyone else found a
better solution
Regards,
Joe K
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Harry wrote:
>
>
John Clizbe wrote:
> Joel C. Salomon wrote:
>>> Message was signed by tho...@bohnomat.de (Key ID: 0x61C7F5B569274BBB).
>>> The signature is valid, but the key's validity is unknown.
>>
>> Hmm and double hmm. Is there someone else using Thunderbird+Enigmail
>> that can duplicate the error message?
t eden wrote:
> So, here is the question: Is is possible to secure gpg (or PGP or
> TrueCrypt for that matter) on a Windows system?
The word "secure" is meaningless except in a carefully defined context.
What does "secure" mean to you? Define the word and then people can
give their own two cents
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Michel Messerschmidt -
li...@michel-messerschmidt.de <+gpg2+maniams+878ee80e19.lists#
michel-messerschmidt...@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:15:48PM +0400, gpg2.20.mani...@dfgh.net wrote:
> > 4. Sorry if this is OT or if this is a long post...
Hello guys,
I ran into a problem when using gpg to sign and encrypt. I have a test run
below (in bash):
$echo abcd | gpg -u b...@xyz.com --output message.pgp -r al...@123.com -se
--passphrase-fd 0 << EOF
<123456
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I was reading through the archives and came across this one dealing with
Hibernation and secret keys:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2009-February/035704.html
So, here is the question: Is is possible to secure gpg (or PGP or TrueCrypt for
that matter) on a Windows system?
--
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> Michel Messerschmidt wrote:
>> Hm, I get a good signature here:
>
> Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>> Same here (using KMail):
>> Message was signed by tho...@bohnomat.de (Key ID: 0x61C7F5B569274BBB).
>> The signature is valid, but the key's validity is unknown.
>
> Hmm and double h
Files received from some end user fail decryption because the embedded file
name contains a path
Here is the full response (from gpg shell)...
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID 21E81243, created 2/25/2003
"MYCOMPANY "
gpg: error creating `/SAPINTERFACES/E-SERVICES/OUT/ZEA270__FILE1':
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:19, joelcsalo...@gmail.com said:
> To rephrase my question /per/ the subject line: Is there a build of
> GnuPG 2 available for Windows?
http://www/gpg4win.org
Please wait a few days and the BETA version of Gpg4win/2 will have its
first release.
gpg4win-2.x is much large
13 matches
Mail list logo
