-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There's a pgp concept that I'm not comfortable with. It has to do with the
difference between owner trust and key validity. And I say comfortable, not
because I don't like it or that I don't think it doesn't work; I just don't
feel like I understand it
John Clizbe wrote:
> Maybe it has something to do with requiring use of a proprietary
> Microsoft SDK?
The signcode.exe tool is proprietary, but it does not depend on the code
being produced by a proprietary compiler. IIRC, that is: it's been a while.
__
Doug Bateman wrote:
> Here's an interesting question why does GnuPG.org bother providing a
> GPG signature with it's downloaded files?
To check the integrity and authenticity of the downloaded file? Not
everyone is bootstrapping GnuPG onto a new machine or even using Windows.
> So this raises
Here's an interesting question why does GnuPG.org bother providing a GPG
signature with it's downloaded files?
I can guess at several possible reasons other than MitM attacks: (a) To
allow users to ensure mirrored copies are legit, (b) To safeguard against
tampering with the file on the downlo
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 gpg2.20.mani...@dfgh.net wrote:
. . .
*some practical questions with the above as given *
- Would It help if I had two networks to connect to ...say the home one and
the office one ?
. . .
Phrasing my answer now in terms related to the original
question starting this threa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
James P. Howard, II wrote:
> There's an implementation for BlackBerry called AtomicHelix
> (www.atomichelix.com). I tried it and it does encryption/decryption
> reasonably well, but there is no support for signing or verifying messages.
There is al
There's an implementation for BlackBerry called AtomicHelix
(www.atomichelix.com). I tried it and it does encryption/decryption
reasonably well, but there is no support for signing or verifying messages.
James
Original Message
From:Werner Koch
Date:Fri Jun 12 2009 05:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:02, malte.g...@gmx.de said:
> I think bringing things like Phil Zimmermann's Zphone to a smartphone would
> make more sense. A free, encrypting voice over ip tool, wouldn't that make
> more sense on a phone?
In fact, we have a free ZRTP implementaion for quite some time:
Malte Gell wrote:
>
> Johannes Graumann wrote
>
>> Is there any of the common smart phone platforms (Symbian, Windows CE,
>> OSX, Android, ...) that enables painless integration of gnupg? For
>> android I'm not even sure yet whether a mail client for anything but
>> gmail exists, but in general:
