On Wed, 6 May 2009 20:11:27 Bob Yang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I hit error when using the below script.
>
> gpg -e "key" "file" < yes
> EOF
>
> Error:
> It is NOT certain that the key belongs to the person named
> in the user ID. If you *really* know what you are doing,
> you may answer the next questi
On May 8, 2009, at 10:37 AM, jnhemley wrote:
I was given a new key to use with our partner for encryption.
Previously, the
key was working fine. I removed all keys and then imported our key
and then
the partner's key. I set trust to ultimate. The encryption works but
I now
get a confirma
On May 8, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Patrick Mabie wrote:
Hello
I was just wondering , can I fix this ?
RPM version 4.4.2.3
gnupg-1.4.5-14.x86_64
CentOS 5.3 x86_64
kernel : 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5
rpmbuild -bb Documents/Rpm/Spec/q7z-64.spec --sign
Generating signature: 1005
gpg: WARNING: standard inpu
Hi All,
I hit error when using the below script.
gpg -e "key" "file" <___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my email accounts is unusable so I deleted the UID from my key
> and uploaded it to the keyserver. That accomplished nothing so now I
> figured out I should of invalidated the UID and then uploaded it. I
> can't do that now because I deleted the UID from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> One of my email accounts is unusable so I deleted the UID from my key
> and uploaded it to the keyserver. That accomplished nothing so now I
> figured out I should of invalidated the UID and then uploaded it. I
> can't do
Hello
I was just wondering , can I fix this ?
RPM version 4.4.2.3
gnupg-1.4.5-14.x86_64
CentOS 5.3 x86_64
kernel : 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5
rpmbuild -bb Documents/Rpm/Spec/q7z-64.spec --sign
Generating signature: 1005
gpg: WARNING: standard input reopened
gpg: WARNING: standard input reopened
Hi,
One of my email accounts is unusable so I deleted the UID from my key
and uploaded it to the keyserver. That accomplished nothing so now I
figured out I should of invalidated the UID and then uploaded it. I
can't do that now because I deleted the UID from my key.
I have to get rid of this em
I was given a new key to use with our partner for encryption. Previously, the
key was working fine. I removed all keys and then imported our key and then
the partner's key. I set trust to ultimate. The encryption works but I now
get a confirmation message.How can I get rid of this confirmation me
On May 8, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Raimar Sandner wrote:
On Friday 08 May 2009 09:14:27 Raimar Sandner wrote:
On Friday 08 May 2009 02:09:31 David Shaw wrote:
One fear that I've seen talked about for SHA-1 is that an attacker
can
create a duplicate document such that if you signed document or
key
On Friday 08 May 2009 09:14:27 Raimar Sandner wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2009 02:09:31 David Shaw wrote:
> > One fear that I've seen talked about for SHA-1 is that an attacker can
> > create a duplicate document such that if you signed document or key A,
> > they could come up with a document or key
On Friday 08 May 2009 02:09:31 David Shaw wrote:
> One fear that I've seen talked about for SHA-1 is that an attacker can
> create a duplicate document such that if you signed document or key A,
> they could come up with a document or key B that your signature would
> equally apply to. That fear
12 matches
Mail list logo
