All the examples of using GnuPG are of giving it a local filename to encrypt or
decrypt. How do I pass it data, either as a stream or byte by byte?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
arghman escribió:
>>> * if I sign a message with that key pair, and someone challenges my
>>> identity, what's the best/easiest way for me to prove my identity?
> I don't need them to interoperate, I would just like to use the same key
> pair. WoT
>It's instead proposing something much different, which is
> unrelated to the original poster's request
sorry bob, rigth, I misunderstood what he had said. It is whiskey
fault. :-) I'll read it again tom.
kind regards,
A.A.
2008/12/18 Robert J. Hansen :
> Andre Amorim wrote:
>>> X.509 (the standa
Andre Amorim wrote:
>> X.509 (the standard used by freemail certs) and OpenPGP use the same
>> underlying algorithms, but the protocols are dramatically different.
>> Making them interoperate is hard, and is usually not worth it.
>
> Robert did you already check this:
The paper does not propose a
>X.509 (the standard used by freemail certs) and OpenPGP use the same
>underlying algorithms, but the protocols are dramatically different.
>Making them interoperate is hard, and is usually not worth it.
Robert did you already check this:
FREEICP.ORG: FREE TRUSTED CERTIFICATES BY COMBINING THE X.
arghman wrote:
> I don't need them to interoperate, I would just like to use the same key
> pair.
If they're using the same keypair, then they're interoperating. (For at
least some definitions of 'interoperability.' Total interoperability is
probably infeasible.)
What you want to do is very har
>> * if I sign a message with that key pair, and someone challenges my
>> identity, what's the best/easiest way for me to prove my identity?
>
>You can't.
>
>Identity cannot be proven. Evidence can be presented, but someone can
s/prove/assert
(at least I think assert is the right word... I coul
arghman wrote:
> * is this a bad idea?
It is a _hard_ idea. It is not necessarily a bad or stupid idea. Like
most things, whether it's inspired lunacy or just insane depends a lot
on your particular problem domain. :)
X.509 (the standard used by freemail certs) and OpenPGP use the same
underly
I'm experimenting w/ using the "freemail" certificates from thawte & was just
wondering if there is a way I can use them with gpg (openpgp, NOT S/MIME). I
can figure out how to use openssl to extract the rsa public key / private
key from the exported PKCS12 file, but I'm not sure how (or if) there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apparently it worked. I like EnigMail.
Vlad "SATtva" Miller wrote:
> Marc Young (15.12.2008 01:18):
>> How to remove "Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)" using enigmail?
>
> Open Enigmail preferences, make sure the "Display expert settings" is
> set in B
Marc Young (15.12.2008 01:18):
> How to remove "Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)" using enigmail?
Open Enigmail preferences, make sure the "Display expert settings" is
set in Basic tab, open Advanced tab, and add this to "Additional
parameters for GnuPG" field:
--no-emit-version
Alternatively, yo
Hi,
I just performed two identical installs of GPG4WIN 1.1.3 on two different Win
OSes, one 2003 server standard and one XP Pro.
After everything is set and some keys are imported etc in both GPG (1.4.7) I
used GPA to try to sign a key in both.
Then I noticed that the window coming up when pre
12 matches
Mail list logo
