On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 04:10:28PM -0700, bezna wrote:
>
> Dear GnuPG users,
>
> I have some questions regarding use of the tsign command; please don't feel
> you have to answer all of them at once, just one will do, although I'd like
> to point out that the one most important to me is #1. I???ve
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 11:46:28PM -0400, Ivan Peev wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> Is there a way to export the secret key without the public key or remove the
> public key from exported secret key? I'm trying the following scenario:
>
> 1. Encrypt data with particular public key on one machine.
> 2. D
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 03:41:05PM -0400, Rick Valenzuela wrote:
> I'm now confused about creating a separate subkey for encrypting, as
> opposed to creating one keypair that signs and encrypts. The example
> I've seen around is that if you're set up the subkey way and the police
> demand the priva
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 01:38:16PM -0400, John W. Moore III wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > how hard would it be to write a patch for an option of
> > --try-all-symmetrics
> > or
> > --use-symmetric-name
> > that would ignore the cipher number and try all of them,
> > or try only the one
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:35:08AM -0700, bezna wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using PGP Desktop 9.8 and I noticed when I export a public key from GPG
> and import it in PGP, any trust signatures made on it with GPG and given a
> depth greater than 8 are lost. Presumably this is because of constraints
>
bezna wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone can provide a rationalization for why this
> is?
This is the GnuPG-Users list, not PGP-Users. Generally speaking, we are
not experts on the internal workings of PGP. You're better off asking
PGP Corporation.
_
Hi,
I'm using PGP Desktop 9.8 and I noticed when I export a public key from GPG
and import it in PGP, any trust signatures made on it with GPG and given a
depth greater than 8 are lost. Presumably this is because of constraints
within PGP, IE the maximum trust depth that can be set in PGP for a
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
bezna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Which is correct?
Are signatures an inherent part of the key
or are they
> stored extrinsically?
>
>
> George
i would put it this way,
when I run gpg in command line mode I create a user ID and a secret
key + a pub
bezna wrote:
> I'm having a disagreement with someone over this. From what I've
> read, signatures on a "public key" or rather, a certificate,
> including the self-signature, are stored as a packet on that key. The
> important point: This data (IE all the signatures made on your
> certificate) is e
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Which is correct? Are signatures an inherent part of the key or are they
> stored extrinsically?
Lets clarify the terms:
- In OpenPGP parlance a "certificate" (as used with X.509) is called a
"keyblock". It is perfectly okay to use the term
Hello,
I'm having a disagreement with someone over this. From what I've read,
signatures on a "public key" or rather, a certificate, including the
self-signature, are stored as a packet on that key. The important point:
This data (IE all the signatures made on your certificate) is encoded on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
