-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
| On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 02:20 -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
|> I'd like to see GPG remain the name for only 1.4.
|>
|> GnuPG 2.x introduces a lot of new crypto support that is not related
|> to
|> OpenPGP. The origin
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Thanks, I was aware of that, but hoping for a built-in method that
> > would do it better, including checking the checksum for me. Oh well, a
>
> Forget about the CRC checksum.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Thanks, I was aware of that, but hoping for a built-in method that
> would do it better, including checking the checksum for me. Oh well, a
Forget about the CRC checksum. It is cruft from old days when mail
gateways garbled messages and PGP di
On 4/28/08, Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However the format is pretty simple: It is the usual base-64 encoding
> enclosed in header lines. Look for the 5-dash header line, then wait
> for an empty line and start your base-64 decoder with the next line.
> A plain base-64 decoder sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, 10 years ago, probably there was just a single variety of GnuPG
(g10)...
- --
Hideki Saito
| On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
|
|> GnuPG 2.x introduces a lot of new crypto support that is not related to
|> OpenPGP. The or
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I have an armored detached signature that I want to dearmor (without
> using the original plain text). I can do it on the command line with
> the --dearmor option, but how can I do it in GPGME? Is it possible?
You can't.
However the format is
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> GnuPG 2.x introduces a lot of new crypto support that is not related to
> OpenPGP. The original metonymy is no longer appropriate.
Well, PGP also has support for X.509 and a lot more.
It is funny that the naming issue is such a hot topic. We
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> unable to decrypt files encrypted for the encryption subkey or signing
> with the sign subkey, though they are listed when i do a "gpg
> --edit-key" as beeing subkeys...
Are they also listed as secret subkeys (sbb)? 1.4.8 fixed a stub key
crea
