Does 2.x work in Vista?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm just curious and do not mean to be offensive or to belittle the
> effort to implement S/MIME, but is GnuPG's S/MIME implementation
> actually used somewhere?
Well, KDE uses it. It is further the only Unix S/MIME application (with
KMail) wh
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:50:34PM +0200, Phibee Network Operation Center wrote:
> Hi
>
> i use this for crypt a tar archives:
>
> /usr/bin/gpg --recipient Stefan --encrypt /tmp/backup.tgz
>
> i use the public key of stefan for crypt, but when i start
> he request all time a "o" (Yes) and say me (s
On Apr 3, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Michael wrote:
~ My question is should I upgrade to 1.4.9 for any particular
reason? My
understanding was that .8 is still more or less "current". Is .9 a
security upgrade?
Yes. The flaw is not trivially exploitable, but there is always a
chance.
~ As an asid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
~ Hi everyone. I know this is probably a bit late, since I generally get
the digest, and also only log on infrequently, but felt I might for the
sake of anyone interested mention that I'm still using gpg 1.4.8 with
Enigmail and thunderbird 2.0.0.12, a
