On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:52:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> More than one version of libassunan installed and both in lib-dirs that are
> used to compile/link?
This was the problem. Works now. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Patrick
___
Gnupg-users mailing
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Compare that to a passport. You might already have a passport. Even if
you don't, it's pretty easy to find out what a passport looks like, what
sort of paper is used in it, what security features are present.
==
ever seen a turkis
> /root/gnupg-2.0.8/g10/server.c:58: undefined reference to
> `assuan_sock_close'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: *** [gpg2] Error 1
>
> What could be wrong?
Do you have the current libassuan-config in your PATH?
More than one version of libassunan installed and both in lib-dirs
Hi,
I am trying to compile gpg-2.0.8 on Linux (x64). I updated all
dependency libs, but when compiling gpg, I get:
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/gnupg-2.0.8/g10'
gcc-g -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -Wpointer-arith -o gpg2 gpg.o
server.o build-packet.o compress.o compress-bz2.o free-packe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Colin Watson wrote:
> In other words, it looks like any time I go through an --edit-key /
> --send-keys / --recv-keys cycle (however extended), I'm going to grow
> six new signatures on my key. Could GnuPG be fixed to check for
> duplicates before i
From the major MUAs only Outlook has problems with PGP/MIME. However,
the GpgOL included in gpg4win 1.1.3 works well although with some
deficies in the user interface. The forthcoming version of GpgOL (as
available in SVN) features a far better integration and also sends
PGP/MIME.
Correct me i
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If the recipient's mailer supports PGP/MIME, this is of course a way
> better solution than any form of traditional inline PGP. All charsets
> are then cleanly usable, without any hack or guesswork.
>From the major MUAs only Outlook has pro
Hello Werner,
On Thursday, February 28, 2008 at 9:17:59 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> Yes there is the Charset armor header but that one is not supported by
> GnuPG because it is a kludge not required since 15 years or so (since
> MIME).
A charsethacked Mutt can make use of this Charset armor
On Wed February 27 2008, David Shaw wrote:
> I wouldn't go crazy here: keep in mind that the web of trust is
> designed for people who don't have the ability to prove that a
> passport or license is real. This is one of the reasons that more
> than one signature is needed to make a key fully valid
Am 28 Feb 2008 um 10:04 hat Wilhelm Müller geschrieben:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:23:34 -0500, David Shaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> David> Why?
>
> David> I'm serious - what is the use case here? How often do
> David> people need to list all recipients of a file?
>
> I a
Hello Martin,
On Wednesday, February 27, 2008 at 20:06:57 +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
> I use GnuPG together with mutt on Debian Etch. I prefer to use
> ISO-8859-1 and have these lines in my .muttrc to accomplish that:
First of all, your Mutt charset setup is quite suboptimal.
Discussing it w
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:23:34 -0500, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
David> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55:28PM +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
[...]
>> > >C:\>gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
[...]
>> So at least three people think it would be a good addition.
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> prove my identity to anyone. I could bring along my traveller's passport
BTW, I suggest to add the day of birth to the UID. As soon as everyone
in the world needs to carry an RFID bugged passport around we can do key
signing much more efficien
Am 27 Feb 2008 um 13:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55:28PM +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> > > >What I meant, was something like this mockup:
> > > ==
> > > >C:\>gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
> > > >gpg: file ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg was encrypted to th
Am 27 Feb 2008 um 19:47 hat Werner Koch geschrieben:
> The solution to this is pretty clear, we need to read all public key
> encrypted packets first and sort them so that own keys come first
> followed by other keys and finally by the wild card keys. This also
> allows us to order the trial decr
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> When sending a mail without using GnuPG (by selecting "clear" in mutt's
> PGP menu), the above configuration results in the following content type
That is your problem. Clearsigned PGP messages are not well defined.
OpenPGP says that all is UT
16 matches
Mail list logo
