On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:05:47 -0800
"Alan Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
>
> >Based on what everyone is saying, the following warning,
> >"There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user" should
> appear fo
On Friday 25 January 2008, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> Ingo Klöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 January 2008, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> >> Bernhard Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> SPOILER WARNING - SPOILER WARNING - SPOILER WARNING - SPOILER
> >> WARNING
> >>
> >>
On 1/25/08, Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > For gnupg-2:
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-crypt/gnupg/files/gnupg-2.0.4-idea.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
>
> It seems that Gentoo is violating the GPL (section 7) b
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> For gnupg-2:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-crypt/gnupg/files/gnupg-2.0.4-idea.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
It seems that Gentoo is violating the GPL (section 7) by providing a
IDEA riddled GnuPG.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
>Based on what everyone is saying, the following warning,
>"There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user" should appear for
>_every_ key I import if the key is not
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:09:33 +0100
Michael Kesper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:02:39AM -0500, Alex wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:32:44 +0100
> > David Picón Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > No, I am starting out with a clean ~/.gnupg folder.
>
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:02:39AM -0500, Alex wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:32:44 +0100
> David Picón Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > No, I am starting out with a clean ~/.gnupg folder.
> >
> > That's it then, if your key is not marked as trusted, or the keys
> > which sign it,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:32:44 +0100
David Picón Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, I am starting out with a clean ~/.gnupg folder.
>
> That's it then, if your key is not marked as trusted, or the keys
> which sign it, how do you expect GnuPG to consider it a valid key?
>
> --David.
>
If