Re: gpgsm and Kmail and X509 certificates

2007-09-20 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > My system is F7. I don't know what the F7 means. > What is your advice? BTW. I can list my secret keys using gpg > --list-secret-keys (or -K) but not gpgsm --list-secret-keys (or -K). Is > it possible that only gpgsm is broken? (missing prer

Re: gpgsm and Kmail and X509 certificates

2007-09-20 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gpgsm --import My_Certificate120308.p12 > gpgsm: gpgsm: GPG_TTY has not been set - using maybe bogus default > gpgsm: gpg-protect-tool: canceled by user You system is not correctly installed. The QT based pinentry might w

Re: gpgsm and Kmail and X509 certificates

2007-09-20 Thread Graeme Nichols
Hello again Werner, This info is in addition to my recent email of today. I have been reading the HowTo at http://kontact.kde.org/kmail/kmail-pgpmime-howto.php and I am wondering if the F7 package for KDEPIM has been built without all the prerequisites to enable X509 certificate support in Kmai

Re: gpgsm and Kmail and X509 certificates

2007-09-20 Thread Graeme Nichols
Hello Werner, Werner Koch wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gpgsm -K >> /home/graeme/.gnupg/pubring.kbx >> --- >> gpgsm: DBG: connection to agent established >> secmem usage: 0/16384 bytes in 0 blocks >> [EMAIL PROTE

Printing Keys and using OCR (was: Proofreadable base64)

2007-09-20 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Peter S. May wrote: > Not meaning to kick a dead thread This must be a zombie by now :) > I've come up with something which I haven't yet tried to implement but > which I think would be interesting to try. Let's call it "proofreadable > base64". It's not terribly efficient

Re: gpgsm and Kmail and X509 certificates

2007-09-20 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gpgsm -K > /home/graeme/.gnupg/pubring.kbx > --- > gpgsm: DBG: connection to agent established > secmem usage: 0/16384 bytes in 0 blocks > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ >> >> this should show you your o