New keyanalyze results are available at:
http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/2007-03-04/
Signatures are now being checked using keyanalyze+sigcheck:
http://dtype.org/~aaronl/
Earlier reports are also available, for comparison:
http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/
Even earlier month
Laurent Jumet wrote:
> Hello Andrew !
>
> Andrew Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> owNCWmg2MUFZJlNZdJmIEgAAe3///nJoRmAH/Niv/3AAf///6gBYUQJIRKgCBAGA
>>> EDAAMkCwANlIioNAGmgAAyAAAaA0aAAB6hoaA0YhwaNGgaDQGTEBkaGQABppkAAA
>>> wQAGqZNBPFTbVPQnqaBoNGgZNMZQG1AAG1NAPUNo0IVjWWSuyM1TmmqY8NR90zKy
>>> 12j
Looks altered to me.
On Friday 09 March 2007 21:13, Laurent Jumet wrote:
> Hello !
>
> If you see an armored message here, don't assume it's crypted, it's
> only
armored
> may be. Run GPG against it first, and delete after; and not the contrary.
> :-)
ClearSign signatures may be altered th
Hello David !
David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please do not send messages like this. Among the various problems it
> causes, it renders the list archive on the web useless, and that list
> archive is important for people to find information. This is what
> this looks like on the web:
