Thanks for all the help! We are going to look into OpenPGP and OpenSSL
(since we may need it for our web server anyway).
--jah
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Shaw
Sent: Tuesday, 13 February, 2007 09:43
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
S
If you happen to be using Mac OS X, you can store encrypted bits of
information in the Keychain. And if you have a .mac account, your
keychain data can be automatically synchronized across systems.
-Joe
On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Jim Hendrick wrote:
> What you are doing works. But take a
--- Nomen Nescio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use thunderbird on my laptop and desktop with an IMAP server, and
> I've been mailing myself encrypted mails with website passwords so I
> have access to them on both computers.
>
> This is just as secure as encrypting a file and copying it onto bo
What you are doing works. But take a look at password safe (Bruce Schneier &
Counterpane labs). Also Password Gorilla (compatible w/ password safe)
If you are truly paranoid, you could encrypt and email the safe back and
forth w/ gpg, or carry it on a USB stick.
> -Original Message-
> F
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:30:04PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> I use thunderbird on my laptop and desktop with an IMAP server, and
> I've been mailing myself encrypted mails with website passwords so I
> have access to them on both computers.
>
> This is just as secure as encrypting a file and co
Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> How embarrassing... my mistake - I was still using the old patched version!
Ah-ha! That's better! As a quick test I threw together the following
helper application:
/*
** Mac OS fails to process bundle information correctly
** for pinentry-mac.
**
** This quick hack
I use thunderbird on my laptop and desktop with an IMAP server, and
I've been mailing myself encrypted mails with website passwords so I
have access to them on both computers.
This is just as secure as encrypting a file and copying it onto both
computers without using e-mail as a medium, right?
O
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:53:38PM -0700, jason heddings wrote:
> Thanks for the reply (and keeping me from making a big mistake)...
>
> So, for doing basic data encryption / transmission, what's the right way to
> go? We just need to do public key encryption, send the data (via email or
> postal
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:53:38PM -0700, jason heddings wrote:
> Thanks for the reply (and keeping me from making a big mistake)...
>
> So, for doing basic data encryption / transmission, what's the right way to
> go? We just need to do public key encryption, send the data (via email or
> postal
