Hi,
* Werner Koch wrote (2007-01-05 14:58):
>Shall we start to measure contributions by the number of source code
>lines [...]?
That;
would;
be;
a;
really;
good;
idea!;
Thorsten
--
War is God's Way to teach geography to Americans.
pgpHziGbYDvBu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Was Fri, 05 Jan 2007, at 08:17:26 -0500,
when Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Matthias Kirschner wrote:
>> But considering your motivation ("grateful [... to] have a Free
>> Software implementation of the OpenPGP protocol.") you donated your
>> m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Was Fri, 05 Jan 2007, at 14:58:26 +0100,
when Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> But considering your motivation ("grateful [... to] have a Free Software
>> implementation of the OpenPGP protocol.") y
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> But considering your motivation ("grateful [... to] have a Free Software
> implementation of the OpenPGP protocol.") you donated your money to the
> "wrong" address. IMHO you should have donated to GnuPG directly, give it
The problem donating i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> If I'm wrong, I invite people to say so, so that I may be corrected. If
> I'm right, I invite people to say so, so that you may be corrected.
I believe I understood your motivation in advocating Donations to FSF
clearly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Matthias Kirschner wrote:
> But considering your motivation ("grateful [... to] have a Free Software
> implementation of the OpenPGP protocol.") you donated your money to the
> "wrong" address. IMHO you should have donated to GnuPG directly, give it
Dear Robert,
long time since you wrote this, but I did not have time to reply
earlier.
* Robert J. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-05 16:06:56 -0600]:
[...]
> This year, I'm grateful that we have a Free Software implementation of
> the OpenPGP protocol. I'm also grateful that the developm
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> in FIPS 140-2 (in which case, yes, it does implement many of them). The
> speaker might be asking whether GnuPG has passed a formal NIST-approved
> certification process, in which case to my knowledge it hasn't.
To my knowledge, no FIPS140-2 (
