Re: [gnupg-users] Re: Still Bad Signatures - KGPG seems broken

2007-01-03 Thread Graham
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 00:07:24 -0800 Robert Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snipped] > I've submitted it as a bug to the kde group. > > Bob. I get the following message using Claws-Mail: Key 0x33ACF71B not available to verify this signature. Do you have it on a keyserver or webpage that I could

Re: signatures using S-Trust smart card

2007-01-03 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I am trying to perform a digital signature with a S-Trust (card issuer > behind some german banks, "Sparkassen") signature card. This is a Well S-Trust, one of the qualified CAs who achieved to work around the digital signature law and still be

Re: Connecticut DSS Requirements for Electronic Signatures

2007-01-03 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > It been proved over and over that changing passwords often is bad. The > reason you ask? People write them down. Just like the people that put a > post-it on the back of a debit card with the PIN. With passphrases used to protect private keys

Re: Still Bad Signatures - KGPG seems broken

2007-01-03 Thread Robert Smits
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 17:55, Chris wrote: > On Tuesday 02 January 2007 12:11 pm, Doug Barton wrote: > > Robert Smits wrote: > > > No, it only seems to happen to me. That is, If I send a message to > > > someone else it's normal and the sig is good. But if I send a message > > > to myself, or t