Charly Avital wrote:
> I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted
> a few messages explaining why).
> If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded
> to compile 2.0.1. Thanks.
Sorry, I'm using linux.
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | UR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Zullinger wrote the following on 12/6/06 11:37 PM:
> I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in
> the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already):
>
> install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gn
I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in
the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already):
install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gnupg'
I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much,
so maybe I've just missed it previ
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the
>> results are the same. :-)
>
> Infeasible: "we have the manpower, we have the tools, we have the
> talent, but the architecture is working against us in a big way."
>
> Unreasonable:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Peter Stoddard wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I tried compiling Gnupg 2.0.1 on a 733 MHz PowerPC G4 running Mac OSX
>> 10.4.8 and the make failed with the following error:
>>
>> In file included from sysutils.c:41:
>> i18n.h:27:23: error: libintl.h: No
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the results
> are the same. :-)
Infeasible: "we have the manpower, we have the tools, we have the
talent, but the architecture is working against us in a big way."
Unreasonable: "our manpower is stretched so thin th
Peter Stoddard wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I tried compiling Gnupg 2.0.1 on a 733 MHz PowerPC G4 running Mac OSX
> 10.4.8 and the make failed with the following error:
>
> In file included from sysutils.c:41:
> i18n.h:27:23: error: libintl.h: No such file or directory
> sysutils.c: In function 'disable
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:59:14 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>Send Gnupg-users mailing list submissions to
> gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>or, via email, send a message with sub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, I will join in too and donate to the FSF, as a strong supporter of
enabling *free speech* (GnuPG and other crypto/anonimity products), and
free software in general.
Peter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Us
Hi folks
I tried compiling Gnupg 2.0.1 on a 733 MHz PowerPC G4 running Mac OSX
10.4.8 and the make failed with the following error:
In file included from sysutils.c:41:
i18n.h:27:23: error: libintl.h: No such file or directory
sysutils.c: In function 'disable_core_dumps':
sysutils.c:88: warni
Hi,
I'm scripting a Tcl/Tk frontend using Expect extension. It's all right up to
GnuPG 1.4.2.
With GnuPG 1.4.5, the spawned process from tcl script (spawn gpg --no-use-agent
--edit-key 0x12345678) echoes back character by character everything is sent to
gpg.
So my tcl script receive back a mix
Randy Burns wrote the following on 12/5/06 9:01 PM:
> It's a great idea. A more direct link is:
> https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/donate
>
> Randy
>
> --- "Robert J. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> This year, I'm giving $10 to the Free Software Foundation
>> (http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Was Tue, 05 Dec 2006, at 16:06:56 -0600,
when Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Whether you're secular or religious, atheist or devout, I think we can
> all agree that the time of the year known as Christmas will soon be upon
> us. This is historic
John Clizbe wrote:
> Eray Aslan wrote:
>> The servers in question already have encryption at the file system level
>> with cryptsetupLUKS for Linux and truecrypt for windows boxes. But the
>> trouble is these do not provide any defense against attacks through the
>> network. They will happily se
hello all ,
i'm trying to import my belgium eID card but it only imports the belgium Root CA
this is the output i get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.gnupg> gpgsm --learn-card
gpgsm[6605]: can't connect to `/tmp/gpg-GXgusb/S.gpg-agent': No such file or
directory
gpgsm: can't connect to the agent - trying
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Your best alternative at this point is to hire a professional
> information security consultant.
[snip]
I'll fight for the budget but it's not likely. Thanks anyway.
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eray Aslan wrote:
> Please tell if there is an alternative.
Your best alternative at this point is to hire a professional
information security consultant. Your needs are highly specialized.
That means that nobody here can give you good advice on wh
Eray Aslan wrote:
>
> The servers in question already have encryption at the file system level
> with cryptsetupLUKS for Linux and truecrypt for windows boxes. But the
> trouble is these do not provide any defense against attacks through the
> network. They will happily serve the emails thru th
Eray Aslan wrote:
> I thought it was a mis-configuration on my part.
Nope. As John pointed out this is simply not feasible to do from
within Enigmail based on the way it has to interact with Thunderbird.
>> If you don't trust the IMAP server admins, then you should store
>> your mail somewhere y
John Clizbe wrote:
> Sounds unreasonable to me. It's completely beyond our scope to
> implement.
That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the results
are the same. :-)
Thank you for the explanation.
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
=
John Clizbe wrote:
[snip]
> There is no provision for processing a message on multiple paths and
> specifying
> separate handling on each path when sending, nor would it be reasonable to
> expect there to be.
Ahh, this is the problem.
> There are two RFEs filed in Bugzilla to allow the unencrypt
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Eray Aslan wrote:
>> Surely there must be a better way. These all require admin access
>> to the IMAP server. The software already does what I want some of
>> the time (when I send the recipient encrypted email). I just want
>> it to do it all the time.
>
> This doesn't
22 matches
Mail list logo
