Werner Koch wrote:
> Please try 2.0.1 which I released this evening.
I tried, but unfortunately version 2.0.1 won't compile either.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincerely
Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter
gcc -I/usr/local/libgpg-error-1.4/include -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -o
gpg-agent gpg_age
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm having trouble compiling the "agent" component of GnuPG 2.0 on a
> Gentoo-based machine. I could not find anything about the error message
Please try 2.0.1 which I released this evening.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
Hi list,
I'm having trouble compiling the "agent" component of GnuPG 2.0 on a
Gentoo-based machine. I could not find anything about the error message
(please see attachment) in the FAQ or by searching the Net, so I hope
that the members of this mailing list are able to help.
If you need any infor
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 11:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Your question is ambiguous. What are you trying to do? Use one key
> pair on two systems, or use two key pairs on two systems?
>
> If the former, simply copy the .gnupg directory to the second system.
> If the former, simply creat
> I am trying to get around the problem of creating one key-pair and using it
> on two different servers (TEST and PROD). Is this possible?
Generate the key on one server, export both private and public key
(gpg --export, gpg --export-private-key), transfer to the other
server, import private a
Your question is ambiguous. What are you trying to do? Use one key
pair on two systems, or use two key pairs on two systems?
If the former, simply copy the .gnupg directory to the second system.
If the former, simply create a second key pair on the second system.
On Nov 27, 2006, at 9:18 A
Hello,
I am trying to get around the problem of creating one key-pair and using it
on two different servers (TEST and PROD). Is this possible?
I am using gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.2.2
Thank You.
Alex Wolff ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Technology Services Group
New Breed Corp.
336-232-4573 (v)
336-217-1680 (f)
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> says that a different socket is opened for this functionality. But then
> a client would know about it only through inheriting an env variable; I
> would use the --use-standard-socket for gpg-agent signing/encryption
> socket, but what about the
