Zach Himsel wrote:
> Also, one question. Should the icon be detailed enough to be big
> (like the gmail logo:
> http://mail.google.com/mail/help/images/logo1.gif)? Or should it be
> smaller and less detailed (for use as a program icon or small logo
> (like the small gmail logo, which is the "m" in
Maybe I can encorporate the "fade to binary" into the GnuPG logo.
Along with the lock in the gnu's nose. I was also thinking that I
could do something with the gnu with the lock as an earring. I'll do
one draft with the nose idea and another with the earring to see which
looks better.
Also, one q
Here´s what i made:
http://img430.imageshack.us/img430/2433/logomm8.jpg
based on:
http://www.gnu.org/graphics/slickgnu.html
It could look cool in white on a black tshirt.
--
Jorgen Lysdal
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists
Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just one remark: A logo should not be a picture. It shall be a clean
> and simple design without detailed artistic stuff. In this sense the
> current GnuPG logo as well as the usual GNU don't work well as logos.
Here's something I did for my own use that's so woefu
Crossed spears on a recatngular field of 1s and 0s?
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Typically when a software vendor says that a product is "intuitive" he
means the exact opposite.
pgpSousBlFRoo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
