Binary install packages are now available for Mac OS X; PowerPC only at
this stage with Universal binaries to follow.
Please follow the instructions at
http://www.py-soft.co.uk/~benjamin/download/mac-gpg/MacOS%20gpg-agent%20and%20pinentry%20HOWTO.txt
This package brings the power of gnupg v1.9.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:31:39PM -0400, Vladimir Doisan wrote:
> The user base of GnuPG is huge, and any serious bugs in the code will
> be weeded out very quickly by the beta testers and early adopters.
> Invalid encryptions is a VERY serious bug.
Sadly this is not true enough, as has been illu
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:15 +0200, Samuel ]slund wrote:
> If I read this thread right you actually wnt to make a decryption and
> compare the results and you do _not_ want to keep the private key on
> that machine.
>
> Could you do something creative with --show-session-key to be able to
> dec
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 00:05 +0930, Alphax wrote:
> Better than that, if you get GPG to sign the file when it encrypts it
> (using a passwordless key/subkey) and/or use the MDC option, you'll be
> able to do this more reliably...
Thank you, Alphax! I'll look into that.
Benny
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
El 14/07/06 19:58, John B escribió:
> Thanks, Laurent!
Idem...
The manual is very compression ;-)
- --
Slds de Santiago José López Borrazás. Admin de hackindex.com/.es
Conocimientos avanzados en seguridad informática.
Conocimientos avanzados en
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 15:07 +0200, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> > Can you please explain what you mean by "check the gpg's rc after the
> > encryption run?" I'm unfamilar with the meaning of "rc" in this case.
>
> return code
>
> every unix code returns an numerical code which by convention mea
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > > gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th,
> > > > probably r4114.
> > > >
> > > > I don't see the problem on
On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:15, Laurent Jumet wrote:
> Hello !
>
> Here, you can download the manual for GnuPG 1.4.4 formated in a
> printable way, in 12 pages:
>
> http://users.skynet.be/laurent.jumet/MyMan_GnuPG-144.pdf
Thanks, Laurent!
___
Gn
David Picon Alvarez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use the OpenPGP smartcard on a GnuPG version compiled for
> MS Windows such as the ones available at gnupg.org? What should I know about
> smart card readers, drivers, et al, before trying to do this? Pointers
> appreciated.
OpenPGP Smart car
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote:
>
> > > gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th,
> > > probably r4114.
> > >
> > > I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely
> > > r418
Hi,
Is it possible to use the OpenPGP smartcard on a GnuPG version compiled for
MS Windows such as the ones available at gnupg.org? What should I know about
smart card reders, drivers, et al, before trying to do this? Pointers
appreciated.
--David.
___
George Ross wrote:
>>> BTW, why are you encrypting these files anyway? If someone broke into
>>> your computer they could just steal the crypto key too.
>> Excellent question! Truth be told, as soon as they are encrypted,
>> they're being moved to another server in another location, and then are
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote:
> > gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th,
> > probably r4114.
> >
> > I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely
> > r4189.
>
> There are no meaningful changes in gpgkeys_hkp between those two
> revi
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:59:52AM -0600, Benny Helms wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 12:25 +0200, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 01:38:23PM -0600, Benny Helms wrote:
>
> > What is your actual threat model here?
> >
> > The simplest answer is to check gpg's rc after the en
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:19:36PM -0400, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> Is there a way to calculate the unencrypted or unsigned size of an ASCII
> armored encrypted message given the size of the message and the length
> of the key?
Yes, but not if compression is turned on (as it is by default).
Factors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a way to calculate the unencrypted or unsigned size of an ASCII
armored encrypted message given the size of the message and the length
of the key?
Cheers,
Adam Schreiber
- --
Why isn't all of your email protected?
http://gnupg.org
http://eni
> > BTW, why are you encrypting these files anyway? If someone broke into
> > your computer they could just steal the crypto key too.
>
> Excellent question! Truth be told, as soon as they are encrypted,
> they're being moved to another server in another location, and then are
> being burned to
17 matches
Mail list logo
