I did figure out that the problem was that the key was not yet
trusted. Once I signed the key, it appeared in GPGFT.
On May 31, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Alphax wrote:
Pehr Jansson wrote:
I am trying to use the GPGFiletool on Mac OS X to encrypt a file
for a
particular recipient. However, it do
Alphax wrote:
> Laurent Jumet wrote:
>> Hello !
>>
>> Charly Avital <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> This is a bit strange.
>>
>> You mean that you cannot read compressed (not crypted) messages.
>>
>>
>
> eg. a message produced with gpg -a -s?
>
Sorry, I should also have pointed out th
Pehr Jansson wrote:
> I am trying to use the GPGFiletool on Mac OS X to encrypt a file for a
> particular recipient. However, it does not show that person as being
> available. Other tools, e.g., GPG in the terminal window, or the GPG
> Mail plug in, have the recipient's key. Why does GPGFiletoo
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4-svn4147:IDEA-TIGER192-DSA2 (MingW32)
owNCWmg2MUFZJlNZeXIg9QABDH/3mvZv7d3u1u7+6/9u9+fv7zbr3P+Y
et9XR/NAAbdzYbgyhoAA0aGgAAAB6gAAANBoAaDQAPUAAAD1AAAGgGgPKBo9TE09
T0nptUKqaep6npDQGgyD0gDQGjQA9TIAaGgaADIAaaaABpiAGgANABoyaAADTQNG
mgiqeRGwk0bUDIGT
I am trying to use the GPGFiletool on Mac OS X to encrypt a file for
a particular recipient. However, it does not show that person as
being available. Other tools, e.g., GPG in the terminal window, or
the GPG Mail plug in, have the recipient's key. Why does GPGFiletool
not find it?
___
Hello !
Charly Avital <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a bit strange.
You mean that you cannot read compressed (not crypted) messages.
--
Laurent Jumet
KeyID: 0xCFAF704C
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.
Hi,
Thanks to all who have responded to these questions. Getting my head around
it
Now.
Will suggest to the customer that we use signed & encrypted transmissions.
The only
Issue we then have is that they wish to be custodians of the private key,
they are
Looking into commerical methods fo
> Sorry I may be missing the point but why does it now show AES or
> AES256 as a pukey?
>Do you mean "does it _now_ show" or "does it _not_ show"?
I meant why does it not show AES256 and also meant pubkey not
pukey. More speed less haste I think :-)
> Home: /SYS$LOGIN/gnupg
> Supported a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Laurent Jumet schrieb:
> When sending a message like this one, signed, compressed but not
crypted,
> is there anything that goes bad, in security terms?
> This is to avoid problems with line lenghth and charsets through internet
>
In securit
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
owNCWmg2MUFZJlNZ4Z2JuQAAwf/3+nMgAmAHT5it/FeAv+//40NAwGDARoAEgFV8
CI6IMAEyRBqqf6iJ5Gp6JiMTTaTQ0xGmZCPSZqGTIyPSbQ1MCNPJk0GpoJhQyYU0
yepkAaDTQAZNDQAAZAaAGg40MmmmTQAMEAaDJoABk0AAAMmQDRE1RVa1+7VU/UdD
MbWeAN1UaDZBbKaN8sm9Pfvik8anY5UA0w1urZgFsq/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Gray wrote:
>>> AES256 is listed as a cipher but not a public key? What is the
>>> The difference? I was hoping to use asymmetric keys with me
>>> Giving the public key to the customer. As mentioned before this all
>>> Works fine but I'm not
11 matches
Mail list logo
