On Wednesday 12 April 2006 04:15 am, Timo Schulz wrote:
>Hi!
>
>After years in the frozen state, I decided to reawake GPGoe again.
>
>For those who don't know GPGoe, it's a GPG plug-in for the Outlook
>Express mailer. It provides inline-PGP operations (sign, encrypt, both)
>and some features to mak
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:15:13 +0200, Storm Ralf said:
> 1348/GPGol: detected Outlook build version 0xd0625 (13.1573)
> 1348/GPGol: actual version 0x1030400 (1.3.4.0)
> 1348/GPGol:virtual version 0x1030400 (1.3.4.0)
> Outlook calls itself
> "Outlook 2002 (10.6515.662
> Can you please enable debugging and send me the lines giving
> the version. They should read like:
>
> 440/GPGol: this is gpgol 0.9.8
> 440/GPGol: detected Outlook build version 0xd0625 (13.1573)
> 440/GPGol: actual version 0x1030400 (1.3.4.0)
> 440/GPGol:virtua
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:43:57 +0200, Michael Bienia said:
> Looking at the available options for scdaemon, is adding allow-admin
> into scdaemon.conf the correct solution for my problem? It is safe to
> use allow-admin?
Right. I forgot about this. I introduced --allow-admin to give
sysadmins a w
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:14:28 +0200, Michael Bienia said:
> This is a recent svn version of scdaemon (svn version 4096).
There is a race with removing and inserting the card. We are currently
looking into it.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
___
Gnupg-user
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:46:21 +0200, Storm Ralf said:
> btw: there is no warning that GPGol does not work with this version of
> OL - as written in the "einsteiger.pdf" manual, page 49.
Can you please enable debugging and send me the lines giving the
version. They should read like:
440/GPGol: th
Hi!
After years in the frozen state, I decided to reawake GPGoe again.
For those who don't know GPGoe, it's a GPG plug-in for the Outlook
Express mailer. It provides inline-PGP operations (sign, encrypt, both)
and some features to make replies to encrypted mails a lot of easier.
And of course it
