On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:37:57 +0100, Adam Funk said:
> Isn't that an undocumented option too? I've just tried "gpg --help
> |grep dump" and "man gpg" with a search for dump, and they both find
> nothing.
Yes, this is indeed not documented. It stems from some experiments
with auto command line co
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:47:21AM -0300, Trevor Smith wrote:
> On 10-Apr-06, at 9:52 AM, David Shaw wrote:
> >Backwards compatibility. CAST5 has been around it seems forever.
> >AES256 hasn't.
>
> Ah, I see.
>
> >It's fine to use AES256, just don't do it with "cipher-algo AES256".
> >Use "perso
On 10-Apr-06, at 9:52 AM, David Shaw wrote:
Backwards compatibility. CAST5 has been around it seems forever.
AES256 hasn't.
Ah, I see.
It's fine to use AES256, just don't do it with "cipher-algo AES256".
Use "personal-cipher-prefs" instead, and list the ciphers you prefer
thanks for the ti
On 2006-04-10, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. There is no compile-time question whether enarmor exists or not.
> It just exists. If you want a list of all keywords that GnuPG
> understands, use "gpg --dump-options".
Isn't that an undocumented option too? I've just tried "gpg --hel
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:11:48PM -0300, Trevor Smith wrote:
> On 9-Apr-06, at 7:28 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> >MDC can be forced on via --force-mdc. As Werner said, the preference
>
> Excellent. So, the follow-up question is, should one use this option
> for files symmetrically encrypted for lon
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 03:19:31PM +0930, Alphax wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:16:14PM -0400, John A. Martin wrote:
> >>> "ds" == David Shaw
> >>> "Re: auto-key-locate pka (gpg version 1.4.3)"
> >>> Sat, 8 Apr 2006 20:11:48 -0400
> >> ds> This means that the build o
Werner Koch said:
>
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:29:51 -0800, Roger Fischer said:
>
> > I downloaded gpgol-0.9.3 and tried it on my system
>
> Way too old. You should use the one included in the gpg4win
> installer: http://www.gpg4win.org.
Tried GPG4Win 1.0.0.
Can still reproduce Rogers bug No
On 2006-04-10, Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:16:14PM -0400, John A. Martin wrote:
"ds" == David Shaw
"Re: auto-key-locate pka (gpg version 1.4.3)"
Sat, 8 Apr 2006 20:11:48 -0400
>>> ds> This means that the build of GnuPG you
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:12:33 -0400, David Shaw said:
> AES256 is vastly stronger than most people need in practice. Heck,
> CAST5 is vastly stronger than most people need in practice. Even so,
For some application there is one point which makes AES stronger that
CAST5 or similar: AES works on 12
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:19:31 +0930, Alphax said:
> Will that also include "undocumented" features like --enarmor?
Undocumented? Hmmm. It is not very useful in practise but it has
been there for many years. You can expect that it will stay with us.
We need it for our regression tests.
Salam
Hi
--On Montag, 10. April 2006 10:53 +0200 Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is there no current man page included or did I just overlook it?
>
> I just checked and indded the page is missing. With the old installer
> (at ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/) the man page is Doc/gpg.man
>
> I
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:52:17 +0200, Thomas Hühn said:
> Is there no current man page included or did I just overlook it?
I just checked and indded the page is missing. With the old installer
(at ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/) the man page is Doc/gpg.man
I'll add the man page to the next release
Hi,
I installed the latest version of gpgol 0.9.8 (actually through
gpg4win),
hoping to get support for multipart/signed message, but it seems it does
not
work (is it supposed to work?). I'm using Outlook 2003 connected to an
exchange server.
I enabled log (in the registry) and could only detect o
(Don't encrypt the passphrase - if you do, then you still need a
passphrase to decrypt the passphrase, etc... etc...)
Asymmetric cryptography can be extremely handy for automated
encryption/decryption scenarios. For example, I sometimes have a
somewhat vulnerable general-purpose machine encrypt d
When decrypting a file I get the following error message. I saw
previous posts but was unable to find what the resolution
Error:
gpg: mpi too large for this implementation (9 bits)
Command line
Echo passpharase| gpg --passphrase-fd 0 -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] --batch --openpgp
-o "position.txt
John W. Moore III wrote:
> While this would probably be a better Question on the Enigmail List; try
> File > Reload Key Cache from the Enigmail Key Management window.
I don't think Enigmail has anything to do with it. It is just passing the
gpg-error messages through.
Anyway, I tried you suggesti
16 matches
Mail list logo
